I think the erroneous mental image I was using was of trying to pack equilateral triangular prisms rather than tetrahedrons. Just didn't think about it properly.Surprised me too.
I think the erroneous mental image I was using was of trying to pack equilateral triangular prisms rather than tetrahedrons. Just didn't think about it properly.Surprised me too.
That was what I posted in post 2 of this thread.Had to look this up.
Apparently, no.
"In geometry, tetrahedron packing is the problem of arranging identical regular tetrahedra throughout three-dimensional space so as to fill the maximum possible fraction of space.
The currently densest known packing structure for regular tetrahedra is a double lattice of triangular bipyramids and fills 85.63% of space
Currently, the best lower bound achieved on the optimal packing fraction of regular tetrahedra is 85.63%."
![]()
Tetrahedron packing - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
My earlier replies to this thread were about the question in the OP and spin-offs from that. I only noticed yesterday that the OP question is a completely different question to the one in the thread title.That was what I posted in post 2 of this thread.
But my fault for not including explanatory text - which you have now supplied.