Nope (don't live in the U.S. anyway).Have you ever belonged to a union and what do you think lead to their decline in the U.S.?
How did that work out?I remember one Xmas back in the '60s when we didn't get presents because the UAW was on strike against GM.
Yes, twice - the first one I helped organize, but it soon amalgamated into a larger, more powerful one. The second was for government employees. They didn't get me particularly good pay, but they were absolute bears on worker safety, which was a serious issue at the time.Have you ever belonged to a union
The short answer: Ronald Reagan. (at the same time, in England, Margaret Thatcher, in Ontario, a little later, Mike Harris)and what do you think lead to their decline in the U.S.?
Hi Laurie: I dislike the labels left or right at least when applied to myself, the same as I dislike being labeled an Atheist.Hopefully things will turn out better in the future as our current opposition leader is a left winger.
1) NoHave you ever belonged to a union and what do you think lead to their decline in the U.S.?
I was actually disappointed that Anthony Albanese missed the top job in favour of Shorten at that time and still believe he could have achieved victory.
A great pity that our elections are still 2 years away!Time enough for the average Joe Blow to forget the current inactions, stupidity and lack of leadership by that sniggering arsehole we now have for PM during our current bushfire crisis. Something I certainly hope I am wrong about!!!
One of the problems with unions is that they're the victim of their own success. The members have become so affluent that they can't afford to go on strike. Thus, they've lost most of their leverage.
In the US, where most states have "right to work" laws, union membership is "optional"there certainly has been a decline in Union membership in my country, as wages and conditions and working justice has been generally achieved across the spectrum.
Well, the unions may have gained safe(r) working conditions, etc. but by now those things should be enshrined in law for all workers, union or otherwise. And if you let the government erode those rights now, you might as well allow government to ban unions too. The solution isn't unions; the solution is kicking the government in the pants.Without it, the bosses can pick you off one by one; claw back all the gains your fathers and grandmothers won.
Should...Well, the unions may have gained safe(r) working conditions, etc. but by now those things should be enshrined in law for all workers, union or otherwise.
That's coming - has come and gone in some erstwhile democracies. It's governments that have successively eroded the unions in North America, just as it had been governments that sent out riot police to break strikes less than a hundred years ago. Union rights have been gradually curtailed by governments over the last thirty years.And if you let the government erode those rights now, you might as well allow government to ban unions too.
Except that would take a revolution or civil war. The people don't own government: money does. Apparently, constitutions and laws are no longer considered binding on government administrations.The solution isn't unions; the solution is kicking the government in the pants.
Then people might as well stop voting - but that would be the problem, not the solution.The people don't own government: money does.