I would first like to state that this is a discussion on evolution. This is not a discussion on alternative explanations. If one were to review my posts one would find that I have not brought up the topic of religion. Those who feel threatened when someone challenges their beliefs should be ready to explain those beliefs. BTW, Sam, to be ignored is a great compliment, since it only reinforces the validity of my interrogations. This is a public forum open for discussion. I am here to present valid evidence againt the fallacy of macro-evolution. I believe the moderator will agree with me. Now, back to the discussion at hand.
"Let me ask this in a plain, simple, and understandable way. Is there anything we could possibly tell you that would change your mind about this? If so, what?"
----------------------------------
Of course I would, but, since there are equally (if not more) valid alternative explanations, how can one derive an absolute decision regarding macro-evolution (one species to another)? For example, the scientific method is based on empirical evidence. However, empirical evidence only deals with real, physical things. Now, how does the scientific method account for the plethora of non-empirical evidence found in this world? Is the scientific method then really taking all available evidence into consideration? The Bell Theorem of nonlocality, or, the subatomic particle neutrino are based on non-empirical evidence, that is that the object or process themselves are invisible but their results impinge on our empirical world and can be measured. Does everything have to pass the scientific method to be fact? Of course not. Even macro-evolution is beyond the scope of the scientific method. So, if you can provide a transitional fossil or explain the many flaws of the geologic column (and the subsequent circular reasoning), then, I will entertain the idea of macro-evolution being valid. Until then, it is simply a fallacy and I will continue to expose it's errors on the many public forums which I attend on a daily basis.