Tell me why you think it is not logically possible that there is no God.
I've already explained this in the form of a logical argument.
The threshold of what they need to know is very low, though, isn't it? Obviously, they need to have been told, or have read about, the idea of gods/God. Once they are familiar with the concept of an all-powerful creator of the universe and so on and so forth, then they are free to believe in God, or not. Right?
Again, this is an atheist comprehension of God. It doesn't matter that God has these attributes, to believe in God. These are things you begin to understand in the due course of time.
What do you mean by a "solid" reason? Can you give an example of a solid reason to believe in God?
I can. But I'm not going to.
In contrast, it took me a lot longer to find out that books like the bible and the Qur'an are, in part, also fictional stories. The difference, in part, is that people will generally readily admit that Peter Pan is fiction, whereas they will insist that the bible is the Word of God, that it's a true historical record, and so on. A lot of people just take that for granted.
So your so-called belief in God was based purely on what people told you?
No wonder you feel angry, and hurtful toward theists.
Does it matter? What would be a good reason for believing, as opposed to a bad one, according to you?
It does matter why you believed.
Why did you?
I went to church for about two years. I learned to play music in the church (the best place to learn IMO), and I never once believed what I was being told about God, Christianity, and Jesus. Simply because I wasn't satisfied with any of the answers. Eventually, after about 2 years I wasn't really welcomed there anymore, because I was asking too many difficult questions, and it was clear I was not going to become a member.
I always accepted God, but I never really understood how God could be. That took years of focusing my mind on the subject matter.
Once I was ready to let go of what I thought I knew, it became easier to understand. The thing is, it's not even complicated. It's very simple. But you have to be in the right state of mind to do this. Actually it is the same with any subject matter. One has to be in the right state of mind to understand it.
So why did you believe?
Could Wendy not be mistaken in her belief? Could she not have a false
Peter Pan does exist, which is why we're talking about him. For some reason, Wendy believes he is real, like pots and pans. The question is; Why does she think this is so, although she has never touched him, and doesn't know of anyone who has.
We cannot know what is behind that statement until we are aware of the reasons why.
Sure. Does the fact that Wendy can give a reason for her belief make Peter Pan real, then?
Peter Pan is real, which is why we're discussing him. But the fictional character that we identify as Peter Pan, is not real in the way pots and pans are.
If Wendy believes that the fictional character is real, like pots and pans, then Wendy could be delusional.
How can you be sure of that?
Because it is the truth.