give your opinion... government lying about technology

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by truthseekerofthegods, May 25, 2020.

  1. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    Exactly! Just like they squelched solar and wind. Need more proof? Note that there are no solar panels or windmills in the world. PROOF!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    Some technologies would be harder to squelch than others. If they control the media and manage to keep the public from knowing that a technology exists, they can be successful at squelching it. If too many people know about it, they can't squelch it.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    So there are a thousand Youtube videos about magnet motors which means they have kept the public from knowing they exist?

    Your theory might have a few holes in it.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Was going quickly through emails and at first thought you had posted "Note there are no solar panels on windmills in the world"

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Thought what madness is this?

    There are no windmills in solar panel farms

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Isn't it curious. Conspiracies are a bit like diseases - they cluster.

    In this case, it appears Moon Hoaxes are co-morbid with Big Energy Squashes.
     
  9. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    The internet hasn't been around that long. People are starting to learn about this stuff but what can they do?

    Start watching this at the 21:00 time mark.

    Fix the World Documentary Part 1
    vimeo (dot) com/68460761


    Here are parts 2 and 3.

    vimeo (dot) com/68427962
    vimeo (dot) com/68449999


    The links didn't appear in the preview so I had to post them that way. When I did a search on that video in Google, it didn't come up. I found it right away in https://www.bing.com/

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...-32&sk=&cvid=1301510F2C554FC294723B761C7D8554
     
  10. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
  11. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    Go to Youtube and search "Magnet motor." About 5 results per page. I stopped counting after the first 50 pages.
    Starting? The first perpetual motion machine was drawn in 1618. The first "magnet motor" was drawn in 1670. You really think that 350 years isn't enough time?
     
  12. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    How many people know about this? Not enough to force the forces of evil that are blocking it to allow it.
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Physicists know.

    Scratch that.

    High school students know this.

    So do Heinlein fans.

    There Ain't No Such Thing As a Free Lunch.
     
  14. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Nothing but optimism, broken dreams and Elon Musk

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    Every high school student in the country. (Who didn't fail physics that is.)
    So build one, smart guy.
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Hey Freddy!! This bloke knows you!!
     
    Michael 345 likes this.
  17. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Liz Hayes is great

    Not seen her for a while

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    paddoboy likes this.
  18. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    Anybody can see that the video is just sophistry. It's part of the government damage-control department.

    They only gave examples of theories that can't be proven one hundred percent. They didn't show the theories that are no longer theories but facts that aren't recognized by the mainstream such as the Apollo hoax.
    https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034

    I'm one hundred percent sure that the Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio but I'm only about ninety five percent sure that the Manson killings were a government black operation to discredit the counter culture.

    https://archive.org/details/GunsAndButter091CharlesMansonTheCrushingOfTheCounterCultureMaeBrussell
    http://mileswmathis.com/tate.pdf


    I don't know if Princes Diana was just killed by a drunk driver or was bumped by the government. She was taking stands that the government didn't like—she was against the use of landmines—so the theory that she was bumped by the government is not whacky.


    John Kennedy Jr. went to Cuba and interviewed Fidel Castro. He was becoming an objective truth-seeker and when he talked, people listened. That was a problem for the government. I think he was probably killed by the government but I'm not one hundred percent sure.


    edit
    ----------------------------------

    http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2012/03/radical-rethinking-of-conspiracy.html
    (excerpt)
    ----------------------------------------------
    You can either embrace the term conspiracy theorist and psychologically flip the language of the enemy to serve freedom, or you can use the language of the resistance, in which the smear term conspiracy theorist is dropped and replaced with the respectable term informed citizen.
    ----------------------------------------------
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2020
  19. foghorn Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,476
    List of conspiracy theories
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories

    In the interest of research, can you give your considered opinion of each conspiracy in the above list please.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2020
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    Give yourself some time. In a few years, with hard work, I am sure you will be able to convince yourself 100% that the world is flat. Don't sell yourself short!
     
    paddoboy likes this.
  21. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    930
    I haven't researched most of those. Here's a link to where I gave my view of the 9/11 attacks.
    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/th...ere-probably-faked.163437/page-2#post-3644366

    I'm one hundred percent sure that the US government planned and carried out the attacks.


    I came across this. I haven't done much research into this issue but I'm not just going to rule it out. It may reflect reality, and it may not.

    https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html
    (excerpt)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    So is it about drug safety or is it about politics?
    If a state pharmacy board, a governor and a state medical association can do a complete 180-degree turn-around, from banning a drug to freely using it, in less than 24 hours, I hope that anyone who is paying attention can FINALLY see that these rules and mandates have nothing to do with drug or patient safety, nothing to do with scientific evidence and nothing to do with effectiveness.

    It is all purely about power and control.

    Why are they fighting against HCQ so vehemently? If an inexpensive drug with a long history of safe use can treat and prevent the syndrome called COVID-19 caused by a virus called SARS-CoV2, it would completely upend the necessity of a coronavirus vaccine. All that money, all those plans and all that power-grabbing effort on the part of the globalists would be wasted. The Plandemic would be over and humanity would be free.
    ------------------------------------------------------------


    I've said this before. An objective truth-seeker has neither a naive willingness to believe, nor an a priori incredulity. You people seem to have a naive willingness to believe when you read the official version of things and an a priori incredulity when you read the alternative version of things. You don't use the scientific method.
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    The truth is Freddy, you havn't researched any of it.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    You didn't take that disprin and have a good lie down did you Freddy?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,640
    That's true! Unfortunately that cure does not exist, and all the magical / political thinking in the world will not make it so.

    The latest, this time from Nature:
    Chloroquine does not inhibit infection of human lung cells with SARS-CoV-2

    " . . . We report that chloroquine does not block SARS-CoV-2 infection of the TMPRSS2-positive lung cell line Calu-3. These results indicate that chloroquine targets a pathway for viral activation that is not operative in lung cells and is unlikely to protect against SARS-CoV-2 spread in and between patients."
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2575-3
     

Share This Page