from your linked
"Still, there is no evidence that a weakened magnetic field would result in a doomsday for Earth. During past polarity flips there were no mass extinctions or evidence of radiation damage. ..."
um
NO
i am not sure how well read you are into these subjects
i have years of experience & a fair amount of depth which gives me perspectives as tools.
1 of those is filtering out or translating splain sheople ass kissing comments.
mainstream media & many journalists including church writers, will include a sentence to write off the empirical alarmist nature of the truth.
some take it to artistic levels.
their fear is scarring people with their article so much people not only refuse to believe plain science, but they then vilify the writer.
thus the comment you have highlighted.
you have to de-code that & throw it away as required.
vague conclusive statements of emotional attachment by a writer is of no real scientific use for the hard science.
and it is hard science that is the only important factor.
the sentence de-codes as "i dont think it will be really that bad, i feel like i dont want to worry to much about things that are scary"
emotive splain cheer leading chant for emotional support as a fear response, possibly well curated to the audience they are imagining or intending to seek repeat calls from.
you have to reduce it to the simple options
you can spend all your time investigating their emotional conditions
or you can spend your time investigating the hard science
i didnt proof read the articles i linked for emotional bents & leanings or writers preference, just basic science data inclusion toward theme concepts & numerical values.
"Still, there is no evidence that a weakened magnetic field would result in a doomsday for Earth. During past polarity flips there were no mass extinctions or evidence of radiation damage. ..."
starting a science conclusion statement with "still" is a bit of a give away.
There is significant hard science data that suggests potential of significant changes to human based habitats from changes occurring during the changing of earths magnetic field.
"pole flip"
is a word like "jihadist"
it has about the same level of hard science value inside an American christian environment
Earths magnetic polarity recently "flipped" with little to no real hard human impact
but that doesn't sell clicks to religious Armageddon worshiping suburban liberals.
dont get drunk on the fumes of the cool-aid your trying to test for cool-aid properties