kmguru
Staff member
You need not ionize a mass of air, just the current path. Use a laser that will carry the current. (Do a little basic research yourself)
Future Major Science Breakthrough- Levitation using anti-gravity matter.
- Thread starter albertchong1999
- Start date
You need not ionize a mass of air, just the current path. Use a laser that will carry the current. (Do a little basic research yourself)
:roflmao:
Ooooh, let me guess.....
This is some guy with a webpage and YouTube videos, right? I'll wager he's trying to sell things like books and cures for cancer, yes? :crazy:
(Of course, I’m not going to waste a second of my time actually searching for the answers.)
:facepalm:
You really need to take a high school class in electricity. For instance, more volts doesn't mean more electrons. 'More electrons' would mean more charge. Also, covalent bonds don't 'flow'. In the majority of cases covalent bond electrons don't move at all. Plastics have covalent bonds, they are usually insulators. The only time you get significant covalent bond electron flow is when you have delocalised electrons such as the pi orbital in graphite. When doing electrolysis you use metals, which have cation lattices through which delocalised electrons flow (pure metals don't form molecules with themselves), stuck in a fluid which has ionic bonded materials dissolved in it. Salt for instance, is ionic and the charged particles are seperated out by water molecules and allowed to flow.
This is stuff I think I got taught when I was..... 13 or so. Well done, you don't even know that.
Isn't our new science grand, it teaches people they learned it all when they closed there last text book, this enables them to do no work on new science and use old science to back there claims.
By the way remember when I told you guys about orbits and how it is impossible for the earth and the moon to maintain orbit for 4.5 billion years with a force involved (gravity) and how I said that orbits are maintained with an attraction force and a repulsion force.
Here it is for the fist time contemplated in one of your science articles.
Newfound Planet Might Be Near Death
" Or there could be "more exotic possibilities," Hamilton told SPACE.com, such as some force holding the planet up against the inward drag of the tidal forces. Hamilton described the possibilities in an opinion essay in the Aug. 27 issue of the journal Nature, where the discovery of the planet is also detailed. "
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090826-strange-planet.html
It is to bad you guys are not as smart as you think you are because you would have understood the current explanation does not make sense and is a lie.
Oh and by the way A NAVY scientists has just had LENR formerly knows ans coldfusion pass a peer review journal recently as well making it harder for idiot skeptics that do no work and out outdated text books to back there claims to refute.
Science News
'Cold Fusion' Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090323110450.htm
What else has science caught up to me so far well i have been gone?
Oh I believe I mentioned time travel here, now in science articles.
I can't remember did I mention hole doping (electron removal) would aid in superconductivity here before it was recently discovered?
I know I have been saying it for years.
" By removing a few of the electrons — a process called "hole doping" -- the remaining electrons can start to flow from one copper atom to the next. In essence, this turns the material from an insulator to a metallic state, but one with the startling property that it superconducts "
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=819
By the way remember when I told you guys about orbits and how it is impossible for the earth and the moon to maintain orbit for 4.5 billion years with a force involved (gravity) and how I said that orbits are maintained with an attraction force and a repulsion force.
Here it is for the fist time contemplated in one of your science articles.
Newfound Planet Might Be Near Death
" Or there could be "more exotic possibilities," Hamilton told SPACE.com, such as some force holding the planet up against the inward drag of the tidal forces. Hamilton described the possibilities in an opinion essay in the Aug. 27 issue of the journal Nature, where the discovery of the planet is also detailed. "
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090826-strange-planet.html
It is to bad you guys are not as smart as you think you are because you would have understood the current explanation does not make sense and is a lie.
Oh and by the way A NAVY scientists has just had LENR formerly knows ans coldfusion pass a peer review journal recently as well making it harder for idiot skeptics that do no work and out outdated text books to back there claims to refute.
Science News
'Cold Fusion' Rebirth? New Evidence For Existence Of Controversial Energy Source
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090323110450.htm
What else has science caught up to me so far well i have been gone?
Oh I believe I mentioned time travel here, now in science articles.
I can't remember did I mention hole doping (electron removal) would aid in superconductivity here before it was recently discovered?
I know I have been saying it for years.
" By removing a few of the electrons — a process called "hole doping" -- the remaining electrons can start to flow from one copper atom to the next. In essence, this turns the material from an insulator to a metallic state, but one with the startling property that it superconducts "
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=819
That might be a valid criticism if it weren't for the fact you were getting wrong stuff which any kid can learn in school. Textbooks don't contain all knowledge but when you're getting the knowledge they do contain wrong then its a sign its unlikely your claims about discovering new science yourself are right.
After all, would you listen to someone claiming to have solved Fermat's Last Theorem if they were convinced 1+1=4?
I understand perfectly our current theory's, most of them are wrong in this case.
Water is now forced through small orifices to make electrons bail, those electrons are now used as a current.
Electrical generating systems are a continually feed system not a closed loop, this explains the fact we never see failure from electron into heat transfer and electron loss due to fraping in the ground and such.
The fast spine state inside generators excites the air molecules, this makes electrons bail out of the atoms, those electrons are added to the system, even Tesla said electrical generators where a variable NOT a constant.
One day they will discover a slight ion/plasma field around electrical generators and figure this out.
I have charged a batter with one wire to my cell via the negative, this can ONLY be electrons leaving my cell (covalent bonds) what is left behind is not only HHO but a ion/plasma energy as well as ORMES (already tested.)
I have charged a battery with one wire to the earth on a non magnetic SS spike, to the negative of the battery ONLY, again this can only be electrons being added.
Wow, free energy for all, thanks to Scott. He saved the world. I suggest he be nominated for a Nobel.
You would have swore the earth was flat, you would have bet your soul we where the center of the universe, you would have laughed at the idea of electrons and microwaves if you truly believe what you just said.
Last edited:
Ah, you're one of those cranks. Not just slightly overly confident in your divine knowledge or a little misguided but a full on out-there crazy wacko.
How come you aren't a billionaire for having a cure for AIDS? Why aren't you publishing papers left right and center on all your incredible conductor technology and results? If you have the answers to some of the most lucrative questions known to Man, how come you're a nobody shmuck?
Oh yeah, cos you're full of crap.
How come you aren't a billionaire for having a cure for AIDS? Why aren't you publishing papers left right and center on all your incredible conductor technology and results? If you have the answers to some of the most lucrative questions known to Man, how come you're a nobody shmuck?
Oh yeah, cos you're full of crap.
The whole "The Earth is flat" thing occured before the rise of Science. Do we have evidence for ions? Yes. Do we have evidence for covalent bonds? Yes. Do we have evidence for electron and ion flow during electrolysis? Yes. Do we have evidence for all of the things in high school textbooks on chemistry and electricity? Yes. You are making claims which can be disproven in schools. It's not like the "The Earth is flat!" claim of someone living in 3000BC (it was known since 2000BC with the Greeks that the Earth is a sphere), who had no evidence either way. You can disprove the flatness of the Earth by sailing around it or going into space. Your claims about electrons and currents and charges can be disproven with stuff sound in school labs.
If you have a cure for AIDS, why can't you prove it? Because you're a big fat crazy liar.
I suggest you give it a try, you might learn something new, i used 2 AA rayovac rechargeable, drained to first 2 hours in my Walkman, left charged outside for 3 days and played again for 2 hours. Unfortunately it did not continue to recharge in this manner.
More tests need to be done.
Ah, don't you just love how the nutters find a home at Sciforums?
Yeah, by now we should have had a few winners of Nobel Prizes in Physics, Medicine, Chemistry and a couple of billionaires. I wonder why we haven't.....
It's probably all our fault for not taking them seriously.
kmguru
Staff member
I am working on the "billionaires" part. May take a few years....at this snails pace. The World Economic Crisis is definitely an opportunity.
But are you doing it by hard(ish) work and good ideas or a get rich quick scheme or a miracle cure? Or perhaps a get rich quick scheme peddling a miracle cure?I am working on the "billionaires" part. May take a few years....at this snails pace. The World Economic Crisis is definitely an opportunity.
I am selling NOTHING, i can offer free energy, FREE to those that are willing to learn, heaven forbid you search for answers when science has taught you everything that is possible already right?
Does it make you feel big to call others names? Or do you think this helps your claims without factual arguments? You clearly underestimate suppression, remember when Tesla's funding was taken away? Why was that again? Oh it was because they could not out a meter on his plans that's right. If you want to learn more watch the war on cold fusion.
Much love to you.
Yeah, by now we should have had a few winners of Nobel Prizes in Physics, Medicine, Chemistry and a couple of billionaires. I wonder why we haven't.....
It really is not that complicated, Nobel prises are allowed not earned, per review panels are set up to allow what is want passed, not earned. The people that wright your text books allow what they want in there NOT the truth. You guys fail to do the research and connect the dots, your reality is dictated to you.
Ah yes, now we get to the classic crackpot conspiracy stuff.
The reason a given crackpot and their woo-woo theories are completely unrecognised and dismissed as drivel is not because the said crackpot is a complete nutter.
Oh no.
It’s because there is some sort of coordinated world-wide scientific orthodoxy that actively seeks to protect their power and prestige by putting down these brilliant geniuses on internet science forums.
Naturally.