Favorite samcdkey posts?

spuriousmonkey said:
Are these examples or her racism, intellectual dishonesty, or conspiracy-laden nonsense?
Click to expand...
here is a splendid example of sams intellectual dishonesty:
geoffp said:
Sam, I think Michael's really got you here. Why not just stop and admit that yes the invasion of Persia was wrong and that yes occupation is wrong? You're tossing around bias and accusations of caste system to attempt to justify it somehow. But it can't be justified.
Click to expand...
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65158&page=18

michael even taunts sam with:
michael said:
...8...9...10

come out come out wherever you are....
Click to expand...

while geoffp and michael are waiting for her to answer their questions sam is playing the field.
i even remind her of that fact:
leopold99 said:
sam
isn't someone waiting for your answers in this thread?
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65158
Click to expand...
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65208&page=6

after i make the above post sam makes 15 more posts in that thread.
michael is still waiting for her reply.
 
Last edited:
leopold99 said:
here is a splendid example of sams intellectual dishonesty:
Click to expand...

Like I give a rats ass:rolleyes:

I answered the points they put out in the debate, but when they avoid the facts and descend to fallacies of distraction and appeals to motives in place of support, I'm done. "Omigawd, you said Persians contributed to the Golden Age, that means you support war and occupation" is on the same level as "Omigawd, you criticise American policy so you are a terrorist supporter".

Btw, can you spell stalking and obsession?:bugeye:
 
samcdkey said:
I'm not the one counting other peoples posts or following them around or sending them PMs.:p
Click to expand...
don't forget sam i've got every PM i've ever sent anybody on this board stored on my hard drive.

edit:
a quick check reveals i've sent you 2 PM's in the last 30 days.
one was about the sciwki article "panama canal" the other was a joke site dealing with cats.
 
darksidZz said:
I do not know her, I do not know what she says, but I understand many are fond of this female. Therefore I ask you to tell us what your most liked post by her is... enter it here for entertainments sake.
Click to expand...

remember what i said!


not female woman!,

woman woman woman woman woman,


stop calling women females i know it is scietificaly correct, but its not incorrect to say women, or lady or even girl,


thats why you dont get any, because you say shit like this, and mating, its not mating its making love or having sex, or atleast fucking,



darksidzz "hey female wanna come back to my place for a few drinks and mate"

women "how about you go and watch the discovery channel by yourself jerk"



peace.
 
leopold99 said:
i even remind her of that fact:

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=65208&page=6

after i make the above post sam makes 15 more posts in that thread.
michael is still waiting for her reply.
Click to expand...

leopold99 said:
i stated that you was a word twisting, race card playing, intellectualy dishonest weasel and i intend to prove it.
Click to expand...

leopold99 said:
so says the person with a 1000 posts a month average.
Click to expand...

leopold99 said:
don't forget sam i've got every PM i've ever sent anybody on this board stored on my hard drive.

edit:
a quick check reveals i've sent you 2 PM's in the last 30 days.
one was about the sciwki article "panama canal" the other was a joke site dealing with cats.
Click to expand...

Can you spell obsession?:D
 
like i said sam, i've made a claim and it wouldn't be very nice of me to NOT prove it wouldn't you say?

the word 'evidence' seems to be lacking in your vocabulary.
but of course the word twisting sam turns it into 'stalking' and obsession'.
 
leopold99 said:
like i said sam, i've made a claim and it wouldn't be very nice of me to NOT prove it wouldn't you say?

the word 'evidence' seems to be lacking in your vocabulary.
but of course the word twisting sam turns it into 'stalking' and obsession'.
Click to expand...

go back to counting and poring over my posts.

Maybe you'll even larn sumtings.:cool:
 
samcdkey said:
Maybe you'll even larn sumtings.:cool:
Click to expand...
like america was responsible for japans explosive economical growthg after WW2?
you still can't admit that can you sam?
can you spell intellectual dishonesty?

ah yes the great sam, comes to the US to study then after taking what she wanted slaps us in the face, not once, twice, or three times, but post after post.

so much fer yer larnins.
 
Last edited:
leopold99 said:
like america was responsible for japans explosive economical growthg after WW2?

so much fer yer larnins.
Click to expand...

explosive is right.

I wonder what the Americans would think of the any other country using the same logic on them; y'know, bomb the shit out of the country and then "help" them to de-militarize and sign a pact saying they will NEVER attack another country in return for economic aid. :rolleyes:
 
leopold99 said:
like america was responsible for japans explosive economical growthg after WW2?
you still can't admit that can you sam?
Click to expand...

samcdkey said:
explosive is right.

I wonder what the Americans would think of the any other country using the same logic on them; y'know, bomb the shit out of the country and then "help" them to de-militarize and sign a pact saying they will NEVER attack another country in return for economic aid. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
perfect example! :cool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top