Fallacy , Space can be bent , warped or contorted .

exchemist said:
As I understand it he was struggling to give meaning to Einstein's energy formula E =√((mc²)² + p²c²) when p in QM has to be an operator. He found he could do it if he replaced single variable by matrices, implying there was a family of 4 entities rather than just the one treated by Schrödinger's original equation. Spin apparently fell out of this, as it fitted with Pauli's attempts to accommodate spin which implied pairs of entities instead of one, but the meaning, if any, of the other 2 remained to be established. Until it was worked out that they would, if real, be antiparticle counterparts of the entity.
Click to expand...
Спин, это как в футболе - с какой ноги пнёшь по мячу, так он и закрутится. Это аналогия.
 
Write4U:

Why won't you answer the question I asked you? It's not a difficult question. You made a claim. Tell me how you know the claim you made is true. If you can.

Stop trying to distract by asking me more questions. Trying to reflect the questions I ask you back onto me is just a smokescreen to cover your own reluctance - or inability - to answer them.

If it's easier, you could just own up and admit that you made a claim you have no reason to expect is true. Then we can move on. But if you're going to stick with it, you need to at least start to try to explain why you think you know it is true.
 
Write4U said:
Yes, but how are tensors created? They don't appear out of nowhere.
Click to expand...
People create them.
Write4U said:
If spacetime itself evolves fractally then is it not the created fractality that is a priori responsible for the emergence of tensors in the process.
Click to expand...
Why do you believe that spacetime "evolves fractally"?
Write4U said:
When we talk about quantum fields in any form, we assume that field consist of a set of fundamental self-similar mathematical values.
Click to expand...
No "we" don't.

"Self-similar mathematical values" is just word salad nonsense you literally just made up.
Write4U said:
To me that suggests types of fractal structures that make up all fields.
Click to expand...
Your made up idea suggests to you other made up ideas. No surprises there!
Write4U said:
Causal dynamical triangulation (CDT), theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, is an approach to quantum gravity that, like loop quantum gravity, is background independent.
Click to expand...
You don't understand a thing about it.
Write4U said:
Note that I post these "thought-processes" as probative for further pertinent information on new and potentially important science.
Click to expand...
What thought processes?

You keep making claims you have no justification for. To me, that demonstrates a complete absense of critical thinking.
 
exchemist said:
This has all gone to shit.
Click to expand...
Every thread that Write4U posts in goes to shit, sooner or later.

The intended tone of this one was essentially doomed from the start, because river started the thread with a claim he couldn't begin to support. And now Write4U has taken over where river left off, making further claims that Write4U can't begin to support.

The result is a pile of stinky rotten word salad nonsense, from those two anyway.
 
Write4U:
Write4U said:

Plant microtubule cytoskeleton complexity: microtubule arrays as fractals​

Click to expand...
Please apologise to the readers of this thread for trying to hijack it onto the topic of microtubules, AGAIN.
 
exchemist said:
As I understand it he was struggling to give meaning to Einstein's energy formula E =√((mc²)² + p²c²) when p in QM has to be an operator. He found he could do it if he replaced single variable by matrices, implying there was a family of 4 entities rather than just the one treated by Schrödinger's original equation. Spin apparently fell out of this, as it fitted with Pauli's attempts to accommodate spin which implied pairs of entities instead of one, but the meaning, if any, of the other 2 remained to be established. Until it was worked out that they would, if real, be antiparticle counterparts of the entity.
Click to expand...
His spinors?
He also overcame a couple of problems like negative probability amplitudes Klein encountered previously.
Also the second order issues with position and momentum.

If I had the time I would like to go through a lot of this from scratch like a first year physics student.
This history side on its own is interesting enough and the mathematics is challenging.
 
James R said:
Every thread that Write4U posts in goes to shit, sooner or later.

The intended tone of this one was essentially doomed from the start, because river started the thread with a claim he couldn't begin to support. And now Write4U has taken over where river left off, making further claims that Write4U can't begin to support.

The result is a pile of stinky rotten word salad nonsense, from those two anyway.
Click to expand...
Haha yes I agree, a thread actually started by river has little enough chance. -_O

But there were actualy some good points being made until Write4U started posting random stuff about fractals all over it. I had not picked up that he actually managed to link fractals to microtubules. That's fantastic! :biggrin: Apart from anything else, the guy seems to have zero self-awareness.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top