Have you been included in any research papers , peer reviewed .
You have 2 minutes to respond from now .
River: This is a totally unreasonable request.
The 2 minute thing.What is unreasonable ?
The 2 minute thing.
Most people do not live on sciforums.com.
If he did give you a list of publications how would you know they were his?Not surprised really
If he did give you a list of publications how would you know they were his?
Did you and exchemist have a discussion suggesting that he was going to get you this info? Post it in the forum?![]()
No - I was just wondering where your request was coming from, if you both had discussed this at one point.No . Do you think we should have ?
It takes like 30s to find a person who has published in my field and get a chunk of their publication history and paste a link to it.That was the point of 2 minutes to respond . If he was part of any research paper he would know the Journal it was published in and the year and month , any body would . And give a link to where the paper can be found and read .
It takes like 30s to find a person who has published in my field and get a chunk of their publication history and paste a link to it.
Why should exchemist give away any kind of personal info to you or anyone else here, river?
Don't be disingenuous. An association between the author's name and exchemist is not already public as you well know.The paper(s), would already be public .
Don't be disingenuous. An association between the author's name and exchemist is not already public as you well know.
So you're disingenuous or too stupid to understand the difference between a real name and a pseudonym. Got it.