Evolutionary theory behind Whites Behaving Unfavorably toward Non-Whites and whites?

Huggins293

Registered Member
Many scientists insist there is a evolutoinary component to the following negroid global behavior patterns:

1. Blacks overrepresent in prisons accrss the world in crime.
2. Blacks overrepresent across the world in intracial crime in all white nations.
3. Blacks overrepresent across the world of low IQs.
4. Blacks overrepresent across the world in undeveloped and unmodernized countries.
5. Blacks overrepresent across the world in unemployment.

Many scientists have claimed that the basis for these global patterns is because blacks have the highest testosterone levels and have smallest brains sizes.

However, there are political and cultural trends involving cauasiod that have been around for 600 years.They have existed the same length of time that these negroid global patterns have existed. They are the following FACTS:

1. Whites nations overrepresent Nations that enslaved whites and non-whites.
2. Whites nations overrepresent in colonalizing or conquering white and non-white nations. (i.e. French, British, Romans, Greeks, Germans, English Americans, Dutch)
3. White nations are overrepresented in poltically exterminating citizens white and non-white nations. (Holecaust, Native Americans)
Roman Empire, Greek Empire,
4. White nations are overrepresented in exterminating and expelling jews and engaging in anti-semetic behavior.
5. White nations are overrepresented in either in segregating racial groups or displaying racial hostility in nations whites are a majority Untied States and nations they are minority. (i.e. South Africa, Britian, Australia)

Since both black and white global patterns have been persistent for 600 years, can we conclude that whites also have a evolutionary basis for their behavior as well? i DO NOT AGREE WITH SUCH A CONCLUSION BUT I FIND WHITES WHO SUPPORT THE FORMER CONCLUSION ARE SILENT ON THESE FACTS. BTW It is ludicrous to hold only white leaders accountable for these global acts. White society in the respective nations have socialized them and have supported their actions. For all the talk about racial biological determinism regarding IQ, I have not heard a biological determinist theory concerning cauasiod domination, subjucation, exploitation for the last 600 years. I VEHEMENTLY DISAGREE WITH BOTH EVOLUTOINARY THEORIES BUT THE RACIAL DETERMINISTS EXCLUDE DISCUSSING THE LATTER.
 
Last edited:
Whites in control and do not want to lose control so they imprison those who disobay.
 
Can you please explain this statement? African Americans were brought here as SLAVES not because they wanted to be here.
 
Then why do non-whites abandon and run from their own country's to live with whites?

Can you please explain this statement? African Americans were brought here as SLAVES not because they wanted to be here.


They have had 150 years to go back to "their own countries." Why haven't they?
 
They have had 150 years to go back to "their own countries." Why haven't they?

Let's not forget how much the white Europeans adored exploring other people's lands. If there was ever a colour which went into other colours' land, it was certainly the white man. Also, they never decide to leave the places they visit...except by war, of course. Impolite guests, I say.
 
They have had 150 years to go back to "their own countries." Why haven't they?


Because they weren't allowed to to begin with but now they feel that they are here already so they don't want to leave for many reasons, freeedom being one of them.
 
I don't really give a shit about this particular debate.

What I would REALLY like to know is, how well received would mass "white" immigration to India, Africa(nowdays not leftovers from colonialism), South America(I supect this would go better than others), CHINA, JAPAN(Oh THAT would be interesting!) and last but certainly NOT least the middle east(and we DO know this one).

Would they make up some "equal opportunity" laws to ensure "whites" were treated fairly?
 
I don't really give a shit about this particular debate.

What I would REALLY like to know is, how well received would mass "white" immigration to India, Africa(nowdays not leftovers from colonialism), South America(I supect this would go better than others), CHINA, JAPAN(Oh THAT would be interesting!) and last but certainly NOT least the middle east(and we DO know this one).

Would they make up some "equal opportunity" laws to ensure "whites" were treated fairly?

British Raj, opium wars, missionaries, colonialism, etc...the white people didn't immigrate - they invaded. If it happened today? Who knows. I doubt they would be treated unfairly, because those countries already have white populations within.
 
Evolutionary theory behind Whites Behaving Unfavorably toward Non-Whites and whites?

Hmm a search through the literature has revealed thus:

image.asp
 
I am looking for a possible evolutionary theory

Whites in control and do not want to lose control so they imprison those who disobay.

Acutally, I am looking more for an evolutionary explanation. One black pyschologists said it may involve the fear of white genetic anhiliation. Nazis and some scientists who support biological determinism may think this is way off base but she is using white patterns of behavior that are global.



P.S. Your're opinion may be partially true. I am an anti-racist but I am not a conspiracy anti-racists. I think anti-racists would do themselves a favor in believing that even the most candid view of white supremacy in the (context of the western world) is sincere. Actually they would not call it white supremacy. They consider biological determinism a reality that shoudl be exposed. It would make blacks less hostile to whites and whites would not be victims of reverse discrimination. I have a different view.
 
Each year, more than 240,000 illegal African immigrants are entering Europe.

http://danmark.wordpress.com/2006/1...immigrants-crime-terrorism-polygamy-and-aids/

In America there is a wall being built in hopes of keeping non-white hispanics from entering America.

That fails to answer the question. I have documented troubling black statistics. So I hope you are not becoming defensive. The question is what evolutionary theory can we assign to these troubling historical caucasian patterns. I believe theire justifications for it were well intentioned. So there must be something in white biology that creates racial fear even when the threat is not present.
 
Sorry you need to answer the threads question first

I don't really give a shit about this particular debate.

Sorry buddy, we have talked about blacks biolgogical tendencies that are not advantageous to the white nations. Your defensiveness is not needed. I was fair to point out how black folks worldwide had disadvantageous traits in the context of a civlilized society.
 
Last edited:
That fails to answer the question. I have documented troubling black statistics. So I hope you are not becoming defensive. The question is what evolutionary theory can we assign to these troubling historical caucasian patterns. I believe theire justifications for it were well intentioned. So there must be something in white biology that creates racial fear even when the threat is not present.
In my opinion,
whites treat blacks better then blacks treat each other.
 
Whilst these trends may be accurate from a certain perspective, it is worth keeping in mind that only the tiniest per centage of people in any society have made any substantive contributions to it.

There is a muckle of trash in all human groups and I give Africans credit for remaining primitive enough to greatly limit their culpable role in our pending environmental apocalypse.

The history of Caucasoids is an almost completely invariant tale of destruction and horror. The paltry few among them (or us, as I am obliged to confess) who have built, improved, and developed on the scale for which all Caucasoids assume credit have been, with only recent exceptions, persecuted, mocked, discouraged, and impeded - by none other than their own racial brethren.
 
Sorry these difference are reality and backed by mainstream white instructors

Sorry buddy, we have talked about blacks biolgogical tendencies that are not advantageous to the white nations. Your defensiveness is not needed. I was fair to point out how black folks worldwide had disadvantageous traits in the context of a civlilized society.

Sorry, the historical patterns have been confirmed by white teachers in the suburbs. It is well known reality. The history books back every last claim that I have made. White perception of human beings perhaps comes down to an evolutionary pattern. Clearly I emphasize whites becuase I assume that their biolgicial inherititance from the ultimate cold environments has made them intelliegent enough to lead the world in technology and cultural influence. Thus, blacks having the same evolutionary trait to poltically dominate and subjucate on a global scale is moot because they lack the genetic capability of a civilization and building techonlogy on par with whites.

However, even if you make the excuse that whites simply had techonology that outperformed non-whites, it would be a myth. The chinese and Japanese are known to have civiliazatoins comparable to whites and yet they did not enslave Africans, Europeans, Native Americans. They did not colonize America or any European naiton. They merely invaded an U.S. military port. So since scientists on this board boldly point out global racial patterns of IQ that inevitably lead to biological determinsim, it is only fair to contemplate biolgocial determinism regarding these historical and present day patterns.
 
Back
Top