why is it not so easily discounted when a bureaucracy is slow and unwieldy? Your comment is nonsensical, especially when you consider the government. It's not like a business where a CEO is hired under a contract: the government officials are more than just a little difficult to get rid of unless there is extreme malfeasance or a similar treasonous problem with sh*tloads of evidence.perhaps ... but his ability to get away with it (stay in office) is not so easily discounted.
trump is an idiot, and an *sshole, but so are many others
and as pointed out: had you taken a cursory look at the constitution (which is freely available) ...Which is why I asked whether people thought he might go for more than two terms. ( Dr_Toad - by seeking a change in the constitution via congress)
erm... noNormally people lie only if they think they can get away with it...
for starters, there are various reasons people lie. In point of fact, your posts above demonstrate a lie that is being reiterated by yourself for the sake of your personal peace of mind and because you don't want to challenge your worldview with factual analysis or details that demonstrate your delusions
(that would be quotes like: "The events that have taken place in Cuba recently are highly indicative of one form of weaponize-ation of quantum entanglement" or "the key word suggesting does not equate to a strong belief but more it eludes to a speculation that has some qualification" [sic])
There is no doubt in my mind that you actually believe what you're saying. The problem isn't what you personally believe. The problem comes in when you try to make it sound like there are scientific or evidentiary justifications for your belief when there is none. Making a claim that there is evidence while only presenting your personal belief on the topic is equivalent to a lie because you've presented a subjective argument that requires the suspension of logic and a faith in the authority or source - you - while there is no factual data supporting you and plenty of factual data refuting your claims. (see also: False Claim)
and so, because you want so desperately to believe in some "reason" that stupidity can exist at such a high and "important" level of political office, you seek out anything to justify your belief, like a psi-attack. Thus you have the answer, now you need "evidence" that you will accept, like:
the problem with this type of argument is that history is rife with similarly stupid situations that are comparable or worse. There is no doubt in any rational persons mind that there will be more yet to contend with. POTUS has the same right to make an *ss out of themselves just like you do.The fact that he can lie to the world at large in such an extreme and obvious manner and suffer little to no consequence for doing so is a key to the question of psi (QE) influence
As for consequenses: considering the lack of ability to actually predict the future, this comment is nonsensical.
Just because one isn't paying the price now doesn't mean one is never going to pay any price at all. This is true of idiots elected to office just as much as it's true of psychopathic psychotic serial killers.