sure thing! - just as soon as you show a link to support your own claims about "
detecting excessive psi influence" in your post
thanks
then why present it as an example?
that is nonsensical
there are always high rates of suicidal ideation in returning soldiers who've served in harsh, hostile or situations where traumatic events take place
there doesn't have to be combat, either,
as you can see by the
volume of data on it
yes
but I've also seen an increase in fanaticism or religion after trauma (or mass casualties) - so does that mean any accident leads straight to jeebus or another similar religion depending on the culture of the person(s) involved?
if you can't show correlation and causation then you're guessing based upon your own biases and beliefs, which could well be delusional (or other)
not rhetorical if you can't prove it, eh?
at best it's an untested claim - at worst it's a false claim. I am going with opinion, though, until proven otherwise
http://www.auburn.edu/academic/education/reading_genie/Fact-opinion.html
based upon the exact same criterion - It can also be therefore proposed (but not yet proven) that unicorn farts cause hurricanes due to entanglement
and again, this is not obvious for the following reasons:
1- you've shown no statistical evidence
2- you've shown no correlation
3- for everything you've mentioned so far, there are far too many
mundane ways you can achieve the same result or conclusion, which your own claims (like suicidal ideation in returning soldiers, etc) you've even provided more evidence for than your other
entangled psi-poo
WTF?
erm... I will list you three books. When you are done reading them, come back here and talk to me again about freedom of thought
The Decisive Moment by Jonah Lehrer
The Male Brain by neuropsychiatrist Louann Brizendine.
The Female Brain by neuropsychiatrist Louann Brizendine.
Let me know once you've finished reading those.
no, they're
not
IMHO - you're reaching for anything to justify your belief
you may also remember that hillary was born in 1947, so she is getting up there in age, making the "stumble" more likely due to age, stress or some other factor
like I said: everything you've argued is evidence
to you is
more likely evidence of something else entirely
if that is the case, here is a test: I have approximately $20K dollars saved up for a nice piece of land to hunt
contact your "good idea who" people and tell them to use their psi-poo to make me send you (or them) all my cash along with a selfie of me nude with a pink tutu on my head. Then they can send you a JPG of the receipt of funds as well as the selfie and you can validate it by showing the JPG to @
Dr_Toad , who can verify the picture is me and that I lost my cash
sounds like an easy test considering they can utilise all their resources for this while knowing the only way to prove they're active (or real) is an irrational crank attempting to spread pseudoscience BS in a fringe thread.
.
.
here is a thought to consider before you continue:
perhaps the reason there is a spike in religion, fanaticism and irrational beliefs is because the freedom and volume of the internet and the lack of the typical person's willingness to actually validate a claim or do basic research before accepting it as legit. This not only explains all the irrational spikes but recent studies about culture, peers and beliefs relating to
politics,
religion,
anti-science and
pseudoscience also confirm this as more likely than psi-poo!