Ethics of Science defined
- Thread starter river
- Start date
Seems to be everything you abhor and dismiss.
What is the ethics of mainstream science ?
It is Destructive .
Not at all, at least no more then pseudoscience or conspiracy nuts see the need to destroy the character of science and scientists.
Science at its core, will only obviously destroy the illiterate unevidenced ideas put forward by those that are ignorant of the accepted science itself. As the old saying goes, know what is inside the box, before you try and invalidate it with woo.eg; Because we see one side of the Moon, therefor it doesn't rotate nonsense.
Sure! Like we see only one side of the Moon because you believe it doesn't rotate? correct river?
Sure! Like we see only one side of the Moon because you believe it doesn't rotate? correct river?
My point made again . ( must be a good tasting shoe ) .
Yeah, as usual a "point" made without any reference.The Three Little Piggies, also made a point.
As did Cinderella!Mainstream science is generally what has been supported by the scientific method and observational and experimental data, as distinct from unevidenced, unscientific and pseudoscientific claims, and obviously and rightly, the kooks and nuts that push such concepts.
None of us can do without science, despite the rhetorical, and conspiracy excuses, the nuts and kooks like to present in its place.
Reminds me somewhat of a nutty, red neck, soon to be ex USA President and his ramblings.