Earth v. Mars

>> ignore URIs post. He's a crank.

Have you the math to prove that ?

I have the math to show you are a fool.

LOL

But as to the Sun expanding, yes I am not sure which is winning. Both processes are exceedingly slow (in our timeframe).
 
URI said:
>> ignore URIs post. He's a crank.

Have you the math to prove that ?

I have the math to show you are a fool.

LOL

But as to the Sun expanding, yes I am not sure which is winning. Both processes are exceedingly slow (in our timeframe).
Click to expand...

thing is...sun's radius is expanding...but is its radiation dispersion changing? is it decreasing?...so will nothing change?
 
all things end eventually I gues

the martian northern hemisphere is indeed renewed.http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMQ4NPJNVE_index_0.html


What is interesting to note is that the present day northern hemisphere is as old as the southern hemisphere yet the northern hemisphere has significant less craters. For what ever this reasons is I'm sure it will be interesting.
 
so what you are saying is that if we could determine the age of the farthest planet, we would have the age of our solar system? the middle planets are varying forms of the timeline.

Interesting philosphy, logical and impressive, why the different sizes of planets? How did the Sun give birth to Jupiter? How did Jupiter acquire such a great mass?

What about God and Creation.
 
John Connellan in this world your only going to retire at 75. Be a little positive 75 years is hardly enof the become demented are yous sure that you would rather die at 75 or get blind, immobile and full of tubes but over the 100?

thecollage
What's wrong with a little diversity.
 
Did he say that the first person to live to 1,000 might be 60 already?! We're going to develop this technology betweeen 15-20 years from now? And it can be used by people over the age of seventy? Does that mean it reverses ageing or does the person look like a 75 year old for the next 925 years of her life?!
 
did you know that a person on Mars that's protected by radiation is proberly going to live longer then a human on earth, because of the gravity.

It's a lovley interview of Aubrey de Grey by Aubrey de Grey.

http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2006/feb2006_profile_01.htm

By the way here is other recent article. 10 Years to proof the concept and 30 years before it can be used against humans. So the concept will be proven long before we visit Mars.

It would apear that a person would look younger again. Altough it doesn't wrealy matter if you get a 130 and can't find a cure for alsheimer.
 
Yes I got that information from a book (kim stanley robinson). I also believe they make a reference in other books and films. But like you proberly noticed it's hard to find any evidence on it on the net.

http://www.exploritorium.com/ronh/age/index.html
But then again what would you do if a dokter said you only gave 1 year to live. I would say your better of on Mars or futher wouldn't you agree:D
 
yeah and even longer on Sedna but try to find a car pool.
I can't say however that I would decline a offer to live longer. Altough the world would get pretty fucked up verry fast if no human would die. Even if we would colonise mars if the world population would double evrey 50 years, then we wouldn't have a 100 years before it's full
 
orcot said:
yeah and even longer on Sedna but try to find a car pool.
I can't say however that I would decline a offer to live longer. Altough the world would get pretty fucked up verry fast if no human would die. Even if we would colonise mars if the world population would double evrey 50 years, then we wouldn't have a 100 years before it's full
Click to expand...

itll never be full...either expansion will solve it or war. Titan, Europa, Io, and Encelados are next on the list of colonists.
The gas giants got enough fuel to power up primitive ways of traveling through space. Xenon engines used for sending probes...next come space stations and space ships...then huge solar sails (like Cosmos 1 project) ... and on and on ... Planet isnt good to live on? Terraform it. Cant terraform it? Extract anything usefull from it. Can extract anything usefull from it? use it as a junk site. Cant use it as a junk site? leave it or destroy it. And move on. Expansion with in-situ chemical utilization for human habitable environment creation. Life is sure fine.
 
this has now turned into a mortality thread.

lets focus on the possibility of this acutally having occurred. if it did, then what would be the expected lifetime for civilization? loosing the atmosphere would greatly resurface the planet which is what i beleive happened on Mars. there are signs of this around rock formations etc. it also appears that the planet did not have as much water as the earth. some, but not the 70% we have.

trying to offer a solution, could we use the oceans to rebuild our atmopshere in attempts to reverse the effect the depletion of the ozone is causing?
 
thecollage said:
this has now turned into a mortality thread.

lets focus on the possibility of this acutally having occurred. if it did, then what would be the expected lifetime for civilization? loosing the atmosphere would greatly resurface the planet which is what i beleive happened on Mars. there are signs of this around rock formations etc. it also appears that the planet did not have as much water as the earth. some, but not the 70% we have.

trying to offer a solution, could we use the oceans to rebuild our atmopshere in attempts to reverse the effect the depletion of the ozone is causing?
Click to expand...

Earth too much to bother with...we dont have the time. We ought to expand to other places like moons, space stations, and planets. Depletion of ozone acceleration is halted by Montreal Protocol...it sure serves the purpose. Ozone hole is recovering for sure. An engineering idea has been made to have huge blankets of foil from sort of material to reflect sunlight partially...but thats all crazy...and people will never invest in it. Most probable solution is to halt release of ozone depleting chemicals...as is done now. Current issue is not ozone but greenhouse effect...and thats something to deal with...

And how can you use ocean to rebuilt ozone? Evaporate em? thatll cause greenhouse effect...as water is main ozone depleting chemical
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top