# Does Chaos Theory prove a Mathematically Ordered Universe

Energy, very basically, is the ability to perform work

Energy is a measurable property of any relationship between matter and / or systems which have the ability to affect (change via energy exchange) each other or systems
View attachment 3613
Types of energy Steamism.com

Units of measurement depend on the type of energy being measured

Yes. Energy is a property of a physical system. The physical system may involve matter or fields or both.

Units of measurement depend on the type of energy being measured
Mass, Density, Matter?

Yes. Energy is a property of a physical system. The physical system may involve matter or fields or both.
That's not even wrong. Size, Mass, Density, Matter? Physical stuff?
What are the dimensions of a field?
What is the mass of a field?
What is the density of a field?
What is the matter in a field?

Better is, "the system may involve non-physical properties", no?
A four-dimensional space or 4D space is a mathematical extension of the concept of three-dimensional or 3D space. Three-dimensional space is the simplest possible abstraction of the observation that one only needs three numbers, called dimensions, to describe the sizes or locations of objects in the everyday world. For example, the volume of a rectangular box is found by measuring its length, width, and height (often labeled x, y, and z).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

Last edited:
That's not even wrong. Size, Mass, Density, Matter? Physical stuff?
What are the dimensions of a field?
What is the mass of a field?
What is the density of a field?
What is the matter in a field?

Better is, "the system may involve non-physical properties", no?

That's not even wrong. Size, Mass, Density, Matter? Physical stuff?
What are the dimensions of a field?
What is the mass of a field?
What is the density of a field?
What is the matter in a field?

Better is, "the system may involve non-physical properties", no?

Better is, "the system may involve non-physical properties", no?

No worse

I weakened

Last edited:
Note that I am not arguing against the term "physics". You are arguing against the use of the term "mathematics".

Note that I am not arguing against the term "physics". You are arguing against the use of the term "mathematics".

I'm not sure what any of your post between 142 and 149 mean but (light bulb moment) it might be because I have someone on Iggy

Another reason why I should not have returned

Question: If everything is physical what happened to the question of "irreducible complexity"?

Does physics stipulate that "irreducible complexity" is true? I cannot wrap my head around that contradiction.

What is the smallest thing in the universe?
The short answer? Quarks. We think.
Quarks might be the smallest things we know of, but is there a limit on how small things can be? Our current theories break down at a scale called the Planck length, which is 100 quintillion times smaller than the size of a proton, or 1034 times smaller than Alice! To go smaller than this, we’d need entirely different physics theories. While it’s not possible to “see” anything at this limit using our eyes or microscopes or any other method, physicists are exploring this tiny edge using lots of mathematical tools.
Want to see all of this for yourself? Perimeter Institute’s interactive website quantumtocosmos.ca lets you explore all the sizes we know of in the universe. You can zoom right in to the Planck length or right out to the entire observable universe.
https://quantumtocosmos.ca/#/landing

Last edited:
I'm not sure what any of your post between 142 and 149 mean but (light bulb moment) it might be because I have someone on Iggy

Another reason why I should not have returned

Great Chart!

What if we changed the Heading to;

.... MATHEMATICS: .....
TYPES OF ENERGETIC VALUES

The list would be exactly the same, no?

Does any of this answer the OP question?

The list would be exactly the same, no?
No - the diagrams on the list would be incorrectly labled

The Point is Write4U , No Matter how Small you go , Something Always Exists .
No one denies that. But what exists does not necessarily have to be "matter"....

Religious people see an immaterial Intelligent Designer God as "existing", no? Be consistent.

No - the diagrams on the list would be incorrectly labled

But they all could be correctly differently labeled, no?

river said:
The Point is Write4U , No Matter how Small you go , Something Always Exists .

No one denies that. But what exists does not necessarily have to be "matter"....

Highlighted

Good

Second statement ;

Life Energy

Religious people see an immaterial God as "existing", no? Be consistent.

What is it that I'm not being consistent about ?

Good
Life Energy
That "immaterial" objects can have existence. God is one such objects, no?

river said:
Good
Life Energy