Myles:
You obviously know what feelings are, so why expect everyone else to be ignorant of them?
I assumed this thread was being pursued tongue in cheek, but apparently I was wrong. I am astounded that anyone could believe trees have feelings, which is why I resoonded as I did.
Let me clarify my position. I enjoy a bit of fun but sometimes my humour has a serious content. When I suggested that we should define our terms, I was thinking of how Socrates would have responded to the question. I even gave a ridiculous answer to the question of whether trees have a sense of time but nobody picked me up on it.
I am aware that other pople have feelings but we use that word in more than one way. We may be referring to
emotional responses or simply an ability to be
aware of stimuli. For example, it could be asked what, if anything, a tree feels if I kick it. Humans talk of a loss of feeling in a limb for example. So my request for a definition of "feelings" was not entirely frivolous.
Feeling in either of the senses refered to is associated with a brain and a nervous system. A tree lacks these and consequently cannot be said to have feelings, hence my attitude to the question. I cannot believe anyone would take the op seriously but it appears you do.
If there is a definition of feeling which excludes a central nervous systen, I would be intrested to hear it.