Discovery of a new particle.

victorespinoza said:
I don't have a camera right now.

But yes we can see the bubbles.

You can also see the bubble grow.

I can't see what the inside of a bubble or Veegtrones and Veegtronesdim created by the increase and decrease of vacuum.

An example drawn by a computer program, would be the following:

example-of-inject-computer.jpg


Very affectionately,
Víctor Elias Espinoza Guedez
July 30, 2013
Click to expand...

You don't have a camera right now .. right ..

Can't you borrow one to take a couple of pics ? I suppose you'll say you can't do that either.

The most disconcerting thing about all this, is that you probably take yourself seriously.
 
The most disconcerting thing about all this, is that you probably take yourself seriously.
Click to expand...
The most disconcerting thing is that they let him out of the institution and back on the streets.
 
Lakon said:
You don't have a camera right now .. right ..

Can't you borrow one to take a couple of pics ? I suppose you'll say you can't do that either.

The most disconcerting thing about all this, is that you probably take yourself seriously.
Click to expand...

Do you believe more in a photo?

It is better to buy a medical syringe and carry out the experiment that I mentioned in the first post.
 
AlexG said:
The most disconcerting thing is that they let him out of the institution and back on the streets.
Click to expand...

Well, you know, there are times where the dividing line between between crazy and genius is rather murky. But not in Victors case.
 
victorespinoza said:
Do you believe more in a photo?

It is better to buy a medical syringe and carry out the experiment that I mentioned in the first post.
Click to expand...

You got a computer, presentation software, etc, but you can't get your hands on a camera ? You are stretching credibility at this point.

Better still, I think you should borrow someones phone (if you don't have one yourself) and take a video of it, then post it. The onus is on you, not others.
 
Lakon said:
You got a computer, presentation software, etc, but you can't get your hands on a camera ? You are stretching credibility at this point.

Better still, I think you should borrow someones phone (if you don't have one yourself) and take a video of it, then post it. The onus is on you, not others.
Click to expand...

Buy a medical syringe and performed the following experiment:

Step 1: Use a plastic medical inject. See figure (1).
Step 2: Remove the needle from the tip of the plastic inject.
Step 3: Insert the plastic inject into a water-filled container.
Step 4: Create a vacuum inside plastic inject.
Step 5: Created the vacuum, remove your finger to fill with water.
Step 6: Remove the plastic inject of the container with water.
Step 7: See the tube filled with water with some bubbles.
Step 8: These bubbles are Veegtrones.

I don't have a camera.
 
The only description of victor is bat shit crazy.
 
Victor,
You do realise that water is just a condensed form of elements that would when less condensed are gases? Temperature also plays an important role as those elements would freeze to a solid if cold enough.

In the case of your syringe with bubbles are you trying to apply this is a metaphor for something else or actually the syringe with bubbles?

If it's just about the syringe with bubbles people are just going to see you as a little crazy because your not discovering anything new, your just excited about observing something that you hadn't seen before or rationalised about (but no one else is particular excited).
 
Stryder said:
Victor,
You do realise that water is just a condensed form of elements that would when less condensed are gases? Temperature also plays an important role as those elements would freeze to a solid if cold enough.

In the case of your syringe with bubbles are you trying to apply this is a metaphor for something else or actually the syringe with bubbles?

If it's just about the syringe with bubbles people are just going to see you as a little crazy because your not discovering anything new, your just excited about observing something that you hadn't seen before or rationalised about (but no one else is particular excited).
Click to expand...

example-of-inject-computer.jpg

look-air.jpg


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
04 August 2013

My Email: victor.espinoza.13@hotmail.com

My Web Page: www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
 
Last edited by a moderator:
victorespinoza said:
conclution-veegtronesdim-i.jpg


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
05 August 2013

My Email: victor.espinoza.13@hotmail.com

My Web Page: www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
Click to expand...

Actually, a veegton acts like a small bubble because it is nothing more than a small bubble. You are not the discoverer of bubbles.

Graunch discovered bubbles when he farted in a lake in the year 198,234 BC. He was also the discoverer of beans, just before the bubble thing....
 
Last edited:
origin said:
Actually, a veegton acts like a small bubble because it is nothing more than a small bubble. You are not the discoverer of bubbles.

Graunch discovered bubbles when he farted in a lake in the year 198,234 BC. He was also the discovered of beans, just before the bubble thing....
Click to expand...

I not discovered that.

I discovered a possible microscopic Black Hole that grows in a vacuum.

conclution-veegtronesdim-i.jpg


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
05 August 2013

My Email: victor.espinoza.13@hotmail.com

My Web Page: www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
 
This looks like perfectly legitimate physics to me... if we're attempting to model Freddy Krueger's nightmare world.
 
victorespinoza said:
I not discovered that.

I discovered a possible microscopic Black Hole that grows in a vacuum.
Click to expand...

So are you assuming that if you had an extremely large syringe that you could manifest a blackhole?

To my knowledge current cosmology suggests that entire galaxies with their combination of momentum and mass is what create's a level of gravitational magnitude to distort lights path enough to create a "blackhole", I think they probably moved beyond "Sy(F)ringe science"

Actually here's something for you Victor to aid.

Firstly a Blackhole is usually suggested to be of such a level of gravity that spacetime is distorted.

In essence to "Prove" or "Disprove" your hypothesis try placing your syringe on a set of measuring Scales, after all if you've created a blackhole then the "mass" of the syringe will become greater when you produce your "veegtron", so in essence your syringe should technically weigh more.

If the experiment isn't enough then perhaps you could explain about "Gravitational Lensing" and how it factors in, in a syringe?
 
Stryder said:
So are you assuming that if you had an extremely large syringe that you could manifest a blackhole?

To my knowledge current cosmology suggests that entire galaxies with their combination of momentum and mass is what create's a level of gravitational magnitude to distort lights path enough to create a "blackhole", I think they probably moved beyond "Sy(F)ringe science"

Actually here's something for you Victor to aid.

Firstly a Blackhole is usually suggested to be of such a level of gravity that spacetime is distorted.

In essence to "Prove" or "Disprove" your hypothesis try placing your syringe on a set of measuring Scales, after all if you've created a blackhole then the "mass" of the syringe will become greater when you produce your "veegtron", so in essence your syringe should technically weigh more.

If the experiment isn't enough then perhaps you could explain about "Gravitational Lensing" and how it factors in, in a syringe?
Click to expand...

Then why grows the bubble when we increase the vacuum and then this bubble decreases in size, when we subtract the vacuum?

There is a hole inside the syringe!
 
A vacuum means the absence of anything in a volume of area it. Vacuum cleaners for instance are misleadingly titled since they should really be called "Suction cleaners".

You have a syringe with a finite amount of liquid in it, when you pull the plunger, if you are stopping new material or air from entering (making it a closed system) then you are causing what finite material exists to be stretched across the volume. Where there isn't enough material to cover the volume of space, bubbles emerge. When you push the plunger you reduce the volume that the material has to spread over so the bubbles look like they disappear.
 
Stryder said:
A vacuum means the absence of anything in a volume of area it. Vacuum cleaners for instance are misleadingly titled since they should really be called "Suction cleaners".

You have a syringe with a finite amount of liquid in it, when you pull the plunger, if you are stopping new material or air from entering (making it a closed system) then you are causing what finite material exists to be stretched across the volume. Where there isn't enough material to cover the volume of space, bubbles emerge. When you push the plunger you reduce the volume that the material has to spread over so the bubbles look like they disappear.
Click to expand...

You say that the bubble within the syringe with water, if increase vacuum, is a physical quantity or volume that is occupied by an vacuum space that is stretched.

Stretch a bubble.

I don't think so.

conclution-veegtronesdim-i.jpg


Very affectionately,
Victor Elias Espinoza Guedez
05 August 2013

My Email: victor.espinoza.13@hotmail.com

My Web Page: www.theory-espinoza.es.tl
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top