Discovery in physics

aforsgren

Registered Member
Hi

I've found something wrong in physics. If you have a long stick on a stone and want to lift something lighter the physics of it is wrong as it is not currently possible to do that without having the physics virtual.

There are only a few papers on the virtuality of physics out.

I must be anonymous as this is a big discovery.

(It is easy to imagine if you just imagine a long stick on a stone underneath lifting a lighter object and think about it as it is not possible to do in reality without using the virtual of physics; hence the current equations are wrong.)

As I said this is a big discovery so feel free to ask your students about this.

If you imagine, for example, a stick on a rock that is lifting a heavy object, it is not physically possible according to the current laws of physics, but requires that reality is virtual. It may take a while for you to understand this, so you have to sit for a few minutes and think about physics using thoughts instead of equations.

You can compare with a short stick instead of a long stick, so you will more easily see that it does not match with the current laws of physics that the object on the other side becomes easier to lift the longer the stick.

How can a longer stick make the object lighter? It is not possible without having the physics virtual.

You notice the same effect here too: https://www.hackster.io/innobrothers/infinity-gears-135f7e

The same effect also in other things that lift heavier than they can, e.g. things that lift cars, cranes, etc.

Remember you have to think and not use equations.

Best regards
Andreas
 
What are you talking about?

Are you telling me I can't use a lever to lift a fifty pound weight?

Do you know how levers and fulcrums work?

What is "the virtual of physics"?

And what does a video of step-down gears have to do with levers and fulcrums?
 
Physics has its foundations in maths. You will not get far without it.
Indeed. Physics without math is called ... philosophy.

Zeno's paradoxen and other philosophical questions were very tough nuts to crack until they faced physics and math, at which point they were resolved.
 
What are you talking about?

Are you telling me I can't use a lever to lift a fifty pound weight?

Do you know how levers and fulcrums work?

What is "the virtual of physics"?

And what does a video of step-down gears have to do with levers and fulcrums?
A step up or step down gear is a lever in principle, surely? Both make use of the idea of the moment or arm of a force.
 
The OP seems confused about a lot of things. Not sure he's helping himself by mixing this in.
Well it looks to me as if this is the common theme running through his misunderstandings. But he posted the same thing on the .net forum yesterday and has not returned, so this may just be drive-by ballocks, I suppose.
 
Back
Top