Is my statement true or false.
Because you’re kind of muddying the line.
Definition of God - one thread to rule them all
- Thread starter James R
- Start date
Because you’re kind of muddying the line.
So why are you content with the idea of nothingness, or itself, as a a cause. Rather than a transcendent reason for its cause?
I'm pretty sure James will agree that it isn't an "explosion" as generally defined. It was an evolution of space and time. and a Superforce...matter came later as has been explained.Sorry that was James, in your other thread.
“The big bang is not an explosion in space, but an explosion of space. There is no centre of the explosion.”
I take it you don’t agree with him then?
Any more "pretend" questions Jan, that you fabricate to try and trap us evil atheists.
All one needs to do is check out your lies, nonsense and trolling in the thread that was closed.
Last edited:
Not at all. the proof of your dishonest carryings on and trolling, was the reason the other thread was closed.
Is your statement true? what statement?
I'm sure though that your intent is faulty and dishonest.
Because my dear friend, supernatural and paranormal fucking nonsense is/are unscientific concepts.
You have also been informed of that.
You’re back-pedalling is so fast, it could supply power to a small village for months.
“Force” implies energy. Still the stuff of the universe.
Was energy existent before the Big Bang?
Or did the BB introduce it?
Relax Paddo. No need to be paranoid.
I’m sure you will handle any question I can throw at you.
I kind of get the feeling that anyone who disagrees with you, and doesn’t back down, will be called a troll. It has lost its meaning. Like “the boy who cried wolf”.
Two fairytales in motion thus far.
Because my dear friend, supernatural and paranormal fucking nonsense is/are unscientific concepts.
That clockwork spring in your back is being wound up a bit to tight there
Have a few nips of your special medicine
Do you really have to cuss?
Do you consider nothingness, and things just popping into existence out of nothingness, scientific concepts?
Don't be silly Jan. If you disbelieve me, ask James to elaborate. I know he will agree. And of course coming from someone who had a thread closed because of your lying and general dishonesty, we can take that again with a grain of salt.
The BB was the evolution of space and time and the superforce in a highly dense and hot state.
More pretentious bravado? Throw all the loaded questions you like, it makes no difference to any mythical creature you like to substitute.
There may be some merit in what you say, if I was the only one. But your lying and trolling has been the cause of a thread closure, and of course, if there was any lack of proof on my part in calling you a liar, it would be dealt with and you would probably report me. Wait a minute!!! You already have.
All that has been explained to you Jan.
And certainly far better and logical then any fabricated mythic creature dreamed up by ancient man and carried on by gullible fools.
Not everything is about you, Jan.
I wrote: "If their God is incapable of definition, they can say so."
Different theists say different things about their gods or God. Your particular definition of God is not the same as Bowser's, for instance. You say that you can define your God. Some other theists might say that their God is incapable of definition. Understand?
Recall that I thanked you when you gave your definition. That is all I wanted in this thread. It's all there in the opening post.
On another topic, if you and paddoboy must discuss the big bang and stuff, could you take it to a separate thread? This current thread is not about that. I'd be happy to try to answer your questions about the big bang elsewhere.
I can rest easy Jan, in that I need not lie and redefine meanings to suit some nonsensical mythical agenda.You have been informed of that.
You and I descended from Apes jan, whether you like it or not, and that is fact, along with Darwinism and the theory of evolution.
So was energy existent before the Big Bang, or did the Big Bang introduce energy, along with time and space?
When did I report you?
I reported BeerWStraw once, but that was for something rather serious.
Otherwise I regard reporting as a cry-baby act. Especially for the reason that one does not agree with me.
Why? Does it offend you? Will I go to hell? I'm sure anyway if I do, I'll have good company Jan, and we can really get to know each other. But its not real Jan...it's a myth Jan...death is it, finality!!!
Go back and check out all your questions and replies and stop trolling.
You must have been lying again...comes pretty naturally for you...or is it dementia? you never told me.
So do I, but others have been watching your trolling.
True. People do say different things about God.
But they all incorporate the definition of God.
Bowser; “So, I would define God as being all things--including you, James.”
Which theists?
I hear you.
But in this case it is related to the definition of God. Either it comes into being via nothing, or a transcendent cause. Either way the origin of everything (God) is assured.
We must now decide why it couldn’t be God.
How does your statement relate to the thread?
Even if your belief was true, it still doesn’t explain what is the origin of everything.