I told you your theory was bullshit several years ago. Alphanumeric told you before that. The facts are. You have to post your work in a journal that requires very little scholarship to qualify for publication. You're using this site to archive the nonsense you call science. You claim that QM and GR are a subset of the bullshit you've been archiving in this public science forum. If you actually understood QM or GR you wouldn't be making such bullshit claims. You're to big a crank to get off the pile of bullshit. Your theory stinks.

It is very difficult to discuss with dishonest dunces.

So once more.

I wrote many times (in this thread as well but you are too lazy to read it or you do not understand what you are reading) that my theory leads to the initial conditions applied in GR and QM. Whole my book and the 88 papers show that it is true. All can read it. Just your "conclusions" are nonsensical.

But all know that in the leading mainstream theories appear infinities, indeterminate mathematical forms, approximations, mathematical tricks and free parameters so the leading mainstream theories are the incoherent/incomplete theories. All know it but not the dishonest dunces. The incompleteness of the mainstream theories causes that together with the good solutions there appear the nonsensical solution as well. But it does not mean that the initial differential equations are incorrect, just they are incomplete.

Because you are a dunce so once more: the initial conditions applied in GR and QM are correct but they are incomplete so there appear the nonsensical interpretations as well.

It leads to the conclusion that the two leading mainstream theories are very messy and scientists try to unify them within the same methods to obtain the complete TOE to eliminate the fact that today the GR and QM are not the unique theories. Do you understand it dunce? For example, even the Nobel laureates assume that the observed acceleration of expansion of the Universe can or cannot follow from the fact that GR is the incomplete theory. There as well are the other attempts to explain the "acceleration" - just you should read more.

It is such obvious that GR and QM need a theory to eliminate the nonsensical solutions as the time loops or the many-worlds interpretation and so on. One of such attempt is the mainstream string theory but it is as well the non-unique theory so useless. On the other hand, the extended GR leads to the superluminal Higgs field and such field is the starting point in my Scale-Symmetric Theory. It leads to the needed limitations for GR and QM and the obtained results are beautiful - all can see it in my papers.

Scientists assumed that we need theory more complicated than GR and QM to limit them (the string theory with extra dimensions and superpartners we never detected). It is a nonsense. Nature on lower and lower levels must be simpler and simpler, not complex and complex and my beautiful results show that I am right.

TOE does not need new differential equations, TOE needs a very simple theory to limit the two leading mainstream theories. It follows from the fact that on lower and lower levels of Nature physics should be simpler and simpler. And it is.

My theory shows that superpartners are not in existence (we will discover only the neutrino-antineutrino pairs), that gravitational waves are not in existence, that the neutrino-antineutrino pairs are the dark matter particles, that the time loops are not in existence, that the many-worlds interpretation is nonsensical, I predicted the 1.93 result concerning the proton-proton collisions, and so on.

So once more: Nature needs very simple theory to limit the GR and QM and it is the Scale-Symmetric Theory.