DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Yes, but it means something different in the context you use it.Short for Pantomime.
To me, pantomime is simply what mimes do by profession and the rest of us do for fun: gesticulate meaning without using words.
Yes, but it means something different in the context you use it.Short for Pantomime.
Apologies Miss Widdecombe wherever you are. My guess is that it is some crazy who has seen her on TV.You're as bad as he is (....and Sarkus too!)
It is Widdecombe.
It is turning intriguing now with the "Terror" investigation.Very Agatha Christie.
My first thoughts , even before this change in the investigation was that it might be Putin sticking his oar in to try and disrupt/demoralise the British Political system.
Ditto with Graham ,but for different reasons.(a favour and a message for Trump?) It is his modus operandi as we well know.
Not sure how reliable are any medical authorities are in America when it comes to these sorts of cases.
Airy speculation of course but with Putin (and indeed, Trump) no beneft of the doubt is due.
.
A panto is a kids play with heros and villains.Yes, but it means something different in the context you use it.
To me, pantomime is simply what mimes do by profession and the rest of us do for fun: gesticulate meaning without using words.
The Daily Mail (I haven't read it or searched it ) have apparently** been "privy" to inside information which clains the suspect had "Russian Communist" literature in the house.Apologies Miss Widdecombe wherever you are. My guess is that it is some crazy who has seen her on TV.
She is 78 FFS, a Tory defector to a reactionary party. What difference was she going to make? To anything?
Now if someone offed Burnham then that is a different story.
Just to be clear, I don't want anyone to off anyone, that is not how we do things in England.
The film looks interesting, I will have to check it out.Oh No it isn't, oh yes it is.
He may not have been in panto, but he was in The_Piano
Seems Graham’s aorta blew up. You can get a scan for abdominal aortal aneurysm on the NHS. I had such a scan about a decade ago. Funny that he seems not to have been checked, unless it is something that can occasionally come out of the blue.You're as bad as he is (....and Sarkus too!)
It is Widdecombe.
It is turning intriguing now with the "Terror" investigation.Very Agatha Christie.
My first thoughts , even before this change in the investigation was that it might be Putin sticking his oar in to try and disrupt/demoralise the British Political system.
Ditto with Graham ,but for different reasons.(a favour and a message for Trump?) It is his modus operandi as we well know.
Not sure how reliable are any medical authorities are in America when it comes to these sorts of cases.
Airy speculation of course but with Putin (and indeed, Trump) no beneft of the doubt is due.
.
"Someone on the internet" claimed that Russia (KGB) has expertise in organising heart attacks that seem "genuine"Seems Graham’s aorta blew up. You can get a scan for abdominal aortal aneurysm on the NHS. I had such a scan about a decade ago. Funny that he seems not to have been checked, unless it is something that can occasionally come out of the blue.
Widdecombe seems an odd target for a terrorist hit. Weird old biddy but hardly of much political significance these days. I remember her from the Oxford Union. She was weird already then, with that characteristic ghastly voice. But I can’t think why any terrorist organisation would be interested in her. Perhaps more likely a lone nutter. Anyway, we’ll see, no doubt.
I saw it. My overall impression was not good. Well executed and acted, but the overall themes seemed to be all-men-are-beasts and a sort of very female wallowing in victimhood. But it was many years ago. Perhaps I might have a different impression now.The film looks interesting, I will have to check it out.
Shouldn’t think so. It’s bloody obvious - literally - if your aorta has blown up. Blood everywhere inside."Someone on the internet" claimed that Russia (KGB) has expertise in organising heart attacks that seem "genuine"
Maybe a burst aorta can be "faked".(just asking questions ;-)
Not my favorite Sam Neill outing - seems like the guys who play nasty characters (see also his role as the vile Major Campbell in Peaky Blinders) are often the nicest people IRL.I saw it. My overall impression was not good. Well executed and acted, but the overall themes seemed to be all-men-are-beasts and a sort of very female wallowing in victimhood. But it was many years ago. Perhaps I might have a different impression now.
Yes ,great to watch.Was it between him and Bradman at the time?So, farewell then, Sir Garfield (Garry) Sobers, about the the best cricketer in history: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2026/jul/17/west-indies-cricket-great-sir-garry-sobers-dies
He put the fear of God into England sides in test matches, but was just so damned good that it was a joy to watch him even while your country was being thrashed by the West Indies. He played in the days when one could watch cricket on terrestrial TV, before it sold its soul and became commercialised out of recognition. Here he is in action - no helmets in those days - at Lords in 1973:
Bradman played before the war.Yes ,great to watch.Was it between him and Bradman at the time?
I never saw Bradman "live".I expect he had the better batting averages,though
I seem to remember Sobers could bowl a few decent overs too.
He was a left hander and Bradman was right handed.
Says he retired in 47.They still talked about him afterwards.Bradman played before the war.
This is nice, in colour too!Says he retired in 47.They still talked about him afterwards.
I meant it was between those two as to who was the best cricketer (before them there was Grace but was there any decent footage of him?)
Yeah right. Get outta here...given the much higher levels of skill
Very good.I don't think I have seen an action like that with another cricketer.This is nice, in colour too!