Crystal Cave

Status
Not open for further replies.
And when you post something I can learn from I'll be appreciative. The rest of your lies and deceptions I can live without. Also you should learn how to count higher than 1.
 
Does the post or does the post not make a statement.
The post makes an implicit claim - that at the very least you consider it possible (therefore, you're claiming it is possible) that Gold is formed in the center of the earth.

You don't know what maybe means either? No surprise.

Re-read what I said.
Take the time to try and understand what I said.

Then answer this question.

Did you, or did you not state that it is possible that Gold is formed by fusion?
Yes, or no.
 
Re-read what I said.
Take the time to try and understand what I said.
You need to consider your own advice.

Then answer this question.

Did you, or did you not state that it is possible that Gold is formed by fusion?
Yes, or no.
I said maybe. Maybe is neither yes or no...:rolleyes:

Now a few questions for you: (1) are you literate? (2) do you know what maybe means?
 
And when you post something I can learn from I'll be appreciative. The rest of your lies and deceptions I can live without. Also you should learn how to count higher than 1.

Again with the personal insults.
Try opening your eyes and you might learn something from my posts.
Try accepting the possibility that you might actually be wrong, and you may learn something from my posts.

What make sthis post even funnier is that you have already explicitly ceded points to me, therefore you've already learned from my posts.
 
You need to consider your own advice.


I said maybe. Maybe is neither yes or no...:rolleyes:

Stop trying to dodge the question.

Or are you saying that, apart from the substitution of a word, that "Maybe gold is formed in the center of the earth by fusion" and "It's possible that gold is formed in the center of the earth by fusion" are not the same statement.

If so, please elaborate how saying:

"Maybe this can happen" is different from:
"It's possible this can happen".
 
When you learn how to read and count I'll stop treating you like the laughingstock and absolute joke that you are. Al Qaeda is less fundamentalist than you are. And more well read too.
 
When you learn how to read and count I'll stop treating you like the laughingstock and absolute joke that you are. Al Qaeda is less fundamentalist than you are. And more well read too.

More irrelevant waffle, abuse and dodging.
 
Just to prove to you, the mods, and the public in general what a dishonest frigging dunderhead you actually are:

When you look up Maybe, you get this: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/maybe

As you can see from that page Maybe means Perhaps, and is synonymous with perhaps and possibly.

When you look up Perhaps, you get this: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/perhaps

As you can see, Perhaps means Maybe, or possibly, and is synonymous with possibly.

And finally, Possibly http://www.thefreedictionary.com/possibly means possibly.

Therefore what I said is completely accurate.

You made the claim that it is possible the earth generates gold in the core of the earth by fusion, something that it has since been demonstrated is not possible (hence the frothing at the mouth and wailing and gnashing of teeth we're observing from you).
 
I can attest that it is hard to stay polite on this board. A lot of that is because so many people bait others to try to get them into trouble.

Anyway, some sort of cold fusion is a reality. I don't think that any of the intelligent researchers actually dispute this. The real argument is whether cold fusion can be produced in usable quantities. A form of cold, or maybe "warm" fusion is already in use to produce isotopes of heavy elements. It requires a fission reaction to power it, but that is available on planet Earth, without reference to the idea of a block of uranium in the center. I'm talking about the absorption of alpha particles and neutrons from the decay of uranium and other natural radioactives. Neutrons create tritium in water, and there is natural tritium in water, which decays to helium 3. Even the creation of tritium is a form of fusion, and this takes place at low temperatures and pressures. Probably not a useful source of energy, but it's a useful source of tritium and helium 3.

Endothermic fusion may occur in ball lightning. I don't hear much about the idea of fusion that is powered by a source of energy like a lightning bolt. If the reactions are endothermic they would use up energy instead of producing it. Both the Farnsworth fusor and any hot fusion project you can name prove the validity of the idea of endothermic fusion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top