Creation of the universe from the middle out....

[James R]

Electromagnetism deals in closed / closing systematic segmented physics to points in the microcosmic and macrocosmic universe.

It does not.

Accelerating contraction. Mass physics.

Those are not English sentences.

Time (2-d Flatland's diamond hard (so to speak) 2-d flat and finite (segmented) photo-frames, 2-d flat and finite (segmented) time frames, 2-d flat and finite (segmented) space-time frames, are finitely observable (observable universe)).

What does "finitely observable" mean?

Tell me what I need to do to "finitely observer" time (2-d Flatland's diamond hard (so to speak) flat and finite (segmental photo-frames)... etc. What is that even supposed to mean? Anything? It reads like it was written by somebody who is slowing losing his mind.

It, gravity, has infinite universality, flexibility, and shape-ability.

You're not communicating anything. Are you aware?

 

[James R]

The "observable" universe, the finite infinities / the infinities of finite "observable" universes, at the macroscopic end.

That is not a sentence

At the other microscopic end, the infinities of points to, of blackholes and wormholes in, the all enclosing collapsed cosmological constant, and thus, too, the cosmological constant of heat, of the Planck (BC/BB) Horizon. The constant Horizon!

Only one math serves to top it off and bottom it out, one and the same top and bottom / outside and inside, an unsigned binary base2 ('0') and/or ('1'), but always plus the Trojan. Always inclusive of the Trojan.

You are not communicating anything.

 

[James R]

I describe a possible third merger physics out of a possible fundable base (mathematically binary base2 (unsigned ('0') and/or ('1')), as I see and interpret it, of relativity physics and quantum physics...

What were the first two mergers?

Where have you described the third merger?

What does "fundable base" mean?

What is "unsigned ('0') and/or ('1")" and why is it important?

I have not seen your description of this "third merger" of "relativity physics and quantum physics" anywhere on this forum. Where can I find it?

 

[James R]

A "'fuzzball' theory" of blackhole strings is beginning to take hold...

Reference, please.

... I just read elsewhere, versus the conventional blackhole singularity theory.

Where did you read this? Reference, please.

I would refer you back to my post #79 regarding such fuzzballs...

Post #79 does not contain a single mention of "fuzzballs" or a "fuzzball theory".

Why are you telling lies?

 

[James R]

The speed of light is not instantaneous across any distances in the universe.

This claim makes no sense.

An object observed to be traveling at nearly the velocity of the speed of light will not position where it is observed.

As a general claim, this is not useful.

It will position at nearly 300,000 kilometers in space, and at nearly one second later in time, than where it is observed to be by any observer at any distance.

This is nonsense.

The same object observed by an observer to be traveling at very nearly the speed of light at a distance of ten light years from the observer, will be very nearly ten times nine point six trillion kilometers forward in space, and ten years forward in time, from where it is observed to be by the distant observer.

Show us your working.

 

[James R]

I remember reading Stephen Hawking's description of the particle with six sides to that single particle; each side developing, being, an individual particle in its own right separate from the other five while yet always inseparably just a side to that single particle with six sides.

Reference, please.

 

[exchemist]

That is not a sentence

You are not communicating anything.

James I’m not a psychiatrist but this all feels very medical to me. It is literal word salad, from someone who is clearly aware of a lot of terms from science but seems to have lost the ability to string them together to convey meaning.

 

[Pinball1970]

James I’m not a psychiatrist but this all feels very medical to me. It is literal word salad, from someone who is clearly aware of a lot of terms from science but seems to have lost the ability to string them together to convey meaning.

If someone has had no scientific training whatsoever, has watched a lot of documentaries that never show any mathematics, any derivations or raw empirical data, they could assume science is just philosophy and Engineering.

Einstein sat back in his chair with his pipe and thought about stuff a lot.

"Mm, I think zis time may be relative! Eureka!"

Reading silly garbage by Kaku (he mentioned flatland) time travel, extra dimensions, teleportation with lots of science terms, would it be possible to build up a picture of what you think all these terms mean and how they relate to each other?

How would one know? What is one's reference? £150 Text books you do not have? Journals you have no access to and would not understand them if you did?

 

[exchemist]

If someone has had no scientific training whatsoever, has watched a lot of documentaries that never show any mathematics, any derivations or raw empirical data, they could assume science is just philosophy and Engineering.

Einstein sat back in his chair with his pipe and thought about stuff a lot.

"Mm, I think zis time may be relative! Eureka!"

Reading silly garbage by Kaku (he mentioned flatland) time travel, extra dimensions, teleportation with lots of science terms, would it be possible to build up a picture of what you think all these terms mean and how they relate to each other?

How would one know? What is one's reference? £150 Text books you do not have? Journals you have no access to and would not understand them if you did?

Yeah, but a lot of what he writes isn’t even coherent sentences. There’s more to this than a pop-sci Walter Mitty.

 

[Pinball1970]

Yeah, but a lot of what he writes isn’t even coherent sentences. There’s more to this than a pop-sci Walter Mitty.

Write4u, River, Mr G and the recent Chinese constipation specialist have posted in this way.
I have tried to extract a question here or there but that tends not to go down that well.
He is fairly coherent when he is slagging me off.

 

[Atlan0001]

I've been told I deal in nothing but nonsense, word salad, and pseudoscience, maybe not even rising to that low a level:

Apparently this unexplainable by current physics and science, too, is nothing but nonsense, word salad, and pseudoscience, if rising to even that low level:

Mysterious Cosmic Signal Detected in Antarctica Defies Known Physics

High above the vast, white wilderness of Antarctica, where the air is thin and Earth feels closest to space, a strange whisper from the cosmos was caught ...

www.sciencenewstoday.org

 

[DaveC426913]

Mysterious Cosmic Signal Detected in Antarctica Defies Known Physics

High above the vast, white wilderness of Antarctica, where the air is thin and Earth feels closest to space, a strange whisper from the cosmos was caught ...

www.sciencenewstoday.org

What does this have to do with the thread topic? Pease describe what we'll see if we follow that link that informs the topic.

If not, new subject = new thread please.

 

[Atlan0001]

We don't live on the same planet or even in the same universe.

Because I don't see it or describe it exactly as some here do, I'm told I'm nothing but a weirdo dealing in nonsense, word salads (instead of so much math salad and salads (and it is "salad" and "salads"), and pseudoscience, if even that!

I suppose I in my weirdness, dealing in nothing but nonsense, word salads, and so on, will have to start finding more articles dealing in the [defiance of known physics!]

Do the people here on this website even know why (WHY) there are wars going on, and wars nearly to the point of going on, all over the world?!?! That there are differences, utterly incompatible differences, going so far as [matter humans] and [anti-matter humans] oppositely charged, that cannot possibly live on the ever shrinking spacetime of the same planet (cannot live in the same local relative universe)!!!!

 

[Pinball1970]

We don't live on the same planet or even in the same universe.

Because I don't see it or describe it exactly as some here do, I'm told I'm nothing but a weirdo dealing in nonsense, word salads (instead of so much math salad and salads (and it is "salad" and "salads"), and pseudoscience, if even that!

I suppose I in my weirdness, dealing in nothing but nonsense, word salads, and so on, will have to start finding more articles dealing in the [defiance of known physics!]

Do the people here on this website even know why (WHY) there are wars going on, and wars nearly to the point of going on, all over the world?!?! That there are differences, utterly incompatible differences, going so far as [matter humans] and [anti-matter humans] oppositely charged, that cannot possibly live on the ever shrinking spacetime of the same planet (cannot live in the same local relative universe)!!!!

You posted the exact same thing in your other thread, "Space-time by the volume."NEITHER have anything to do with the thread topic OR support any of your posts in them.

 

[DaveC426913]

We don't live on the same planet or even in the same universe.

Because I don't see it or describe it exactly as some here do, I'm told I'm nothing but a weirdo dealing in nonsense, word salads (instead of so much math salad and salads (and it is "salad" and "salads"), and pseudoscience, if even that!

From the site rules:

E14. The aim of writing anything is to communicate something to somebody else.

If you are trying to communicate with us, it behooves you to do so in commonly understood language, with facts as a basis we can agree on, and appropriately-sued terminology.

If you are not trying to communicate with us, why are you posting here at all?

Do the people here on this website even know why (WHY) there are wars going on, and wars nearly to the point of going on, all over the world?!?!

Reported as off-topic.

That there are differences, utterly incompatible differences, going so far as [matter humans] and [anti-matter humans] oppositely charged, that cannot possibly live on the ever shrinking spacetime of the same planet (cannot live in the same local relative universe)!!!!

"Anti-matter humans..."

Reported as ... um ... paranoid delusions? Anybody got a better bucket to throw this in?

And also, off-topic.

And also, not pseudoscience. Unless youve got some evidential support for these anti-matter humans, this does not belong in pseudoscience.

 

[James R]

I've been told I deal in nothing but nonsense, word salad, and pseudoscience, maybe not even rising to that low a level:

Are you going to respond to the specific criticisms of your posts that I made, or not?

 

[Atlan0001]

Are you going to respond to the specific criticisms of your posts that I made, or not?

But I did, en-masse. Reread my last post with additions.

 

[James R]

This thread is closed. Atlan0001 doesn't seem to want to discuss the topic he posted about, any more.