Vmedvil
Registered Member
Hence, logically, it appears quite possible', whatever needed to sustain nature and its balance is naturally selected. Mostly, we look only one side of it i e. Survival of fittest. But this may not be sufficient to sustain and balance the nature so we may also need tó look other angles. One such sngle is providing sufficient food to sustain the fittest ones.
Food isn't really that important let's say that all the food bearing plants and animals died or had defenses against being eaten such as being poisonous then natural selection would select autotrophs(Photosynthetic Organisms) to survive and continue to live as organisms that eat other organisms would die off eventually and be less likely to reproduce, thus giving autotrophs the advantage evolutionarily making them the dominate type of life instead of carnivores/herbivores.
Last edited: