Wow. Applause for adding, "or not".Theoryofrelativity said:she took it upon herself to betray a confidence from another member or NOT as the case may be
I really think that is appropriate.
Wow. Applause for adding, "or not".Theoryofrelativity said:she took it upon herself to betray a confidence from another member or NOT as the case may be
Oh.Theoryofrelativity said:the 'OR NOT' cole means she could have made the whole thing up. Lies in other words.
Kanteletar said:I am Ron's wife, not yet informed or slagged off.
For others all this may be trivial, but I have to put up with the distress. I got no sleep last night as a result and I have to work in a hospital during the daytime. Lives are at risk.
There are easier ways to not come to sciforums.Theoryofrelativity said:Ban here I come. Please make it permanent.
cole grey said:There are easier ways to not come to sciforums.
You're a big girl and you can take responsibility for yourself.
I skipped out for several months on end, and I'm sure i will again, no need for a ban.
And can you please, for God's sake, drop the detective-novel-inspired chain of events exposé?
Theoryofrelativity said:For reasons unknown spurious and devil used rons avatar image as their own. Ron predictably complained, heated debate followed.
Water steps in from NOWHERE and says ron did the same to her....
a coincidence you think?
after reading this post of yours i hope he doesTheoryofrelativity said:James ban me if you think its valid. I have asked you to delete me from existance, please feel free to do so at any time.
what has it got to do with you?I did not approach water regarding this matter she approached me after I rightly asked why she assumed this argument about the avatar had anything to do with her.
of course! how stupid and naive everyone is. water told spurious to use the avatar, she told TDI to use it, she even told me to use it.If you can't see that she manipulated this entire situation (mainly in pm) so that it would revolve around her then you are very naive.
yes lets talk about betraying the confidence of another member. if anyone sends you a PM they can be gaurenteed that the entire board will know about it. if anyone doubts that statement reread the qoute again.I will post the pm's I had from water to you, so you can see for yourself why I was so upset that she took it upon herself to betray a confidence from another member or NOT as the case may be.
did you even for once think of sending her a pm stating "any PM you send me water will be posted on the board"?I replied to her publically as I don't like the nature of 'behind the back' slanderous comments and I did not request them. I can of course put her on ignore to ensure no more. Which I shall indeed do.
yes Tor, you're in the same catagory as ronBUT do not even attempt to lump me in the same catagory as Ron.
i find it very telling that only you, ron, and kantaleter refer to waters "PM campaign"You are correct no member deserves to be stalked. I actively discouraged Ron. Meanwhile Water invited this controversy by attributing a perfectly seperate argument to herself. Then proceeded with her Pm campaign.
no you just wave it in front of everybodys noses and say "looky what i got, a PM from water smearing other posters"You read the pm I had from water and then tell me if you think warning Kanteletar is justified. IT IS NOT. Kanteletar wants to know what water has been saying about her and her husband to the board members in pm behind their backs. I have not told them as I do not think it is appropriate.
first thing you said i agree with, IF it's true.But as ron and water were friends at some point and any confidence he shared with her should not be taken out of context and USED to facilitate her own agenda.
well, there you go.It may not even be true.
if ron doesn't know by now that water wants nothing more of this situation then the the only thing to say about ron is "damn you ARE a dumb twit aren't you"Ron cannot answer the allegation as he does not know what it is. Dispicable behaviour really and truely makes me sick to the pit of my stomach.
i'm crossing my fingers.If you thinks it acceptable
Ban me. delete me.
leopold99 said:after reading this post of yours i hope he does
what has it got to do with you?
of course! how stupid and naive everyone is. water told spurious to use the avatar, she told TDI to use it, she even told me to use it.
yes lets talk about betraying the confidence of another member. if anyone sends you a PM they can be gaurenteed that the entire board will know about it. if anyone doubts that statement reread the qoute again.
did you even for once think of sending her a pm stating "any PM you send me water will be posted on the board"?
yes Tor, you're in the same catagory as ron
i find it very telling that only you, ron, and kantaleter refer to waters "PM campaign"
no you just wave it in front of everybodys noses and say "looky what i got, a PM from water smearing other posters"
first thing you said i agree with, IF it's true.
well, there you go.
if ron doesn't know by now that water wants nothing more of this situation then the the only thing to say about ron is "damn you ARE a dumb twit aren't you"
i'm crossing my fingers.
if anyone sends you a PM after this diatribe it's their own dumbass fault.
Tor you dumb bitch i never posted, or said anything about a PM from water. it was YOU that said i was talking about water, remember?Theoryofrelativity said:Leo you blind fuck, I haven't copied waters pm here. YOU were the one that referred to the contents of one of her pm's.
like i said you have no idea who sent me that PMAND I shan't refer to it (as did LEO) on a 'no names basis' when it is blatantly obvious who's pm it was.
leopold99 said:Tor you dumb bitch i never posted, or said anything about a PM from water. it was YOU that said i was talking about water, remember?
and you STILL don't know where the PM i refered to came from.
like i said you have no idea who sent me that PM
leopold99 said:i often wondered why a certain poster refered to ron as dangerous in PMs to me, now i realize what they meant.
Theoryofrelativity said:not because I have trouble staying away.
i didn't post the contents, i merely repeated what it said. i deny nothing except YOUR claim it was from water.Theoryofrelativity said:too late for your denials. You have been caught out.
wrong. see aboveYOU posted the CONTENTS of a private PM.
BULLYING? you really don't want to know how i feel about ah, um, well nevermind.Contents which were malicious in nature regarding another member of the board. You used that comment to further influence the boards negative view of ron. BULLYING
apparently james agrees with you, after all he did get away with threatening another poster with murder and insinuating that he was going to sue sciforums, yeah poor ron.If anyone has been bullied and harrassed recently its been ron.
this from me is from YOUR INSISTENCE THAT THE PM I MENTIONED CAME FROM WATER. Tor you DO NOT KNOW WHERE IT CAME FROM. period.I'm harrassed periodically too, but who gives a fuck. AND GUESS WHAT, it is always the same people doing the bullying. YOU are always there, as is SPURIOUS, lead bully and his side kick (pal of mine but non the less......) devilinside.
Etc etc, blah blah.
Theoryofrelativity said:James will do as he see's fit. So it maybe goodnight or it may goodbye. I do not care either way.
James R said:Kanteletar (Anne):
Like Ron, I must say that you seem to have a hard time differentiating among matters which are private and those which are appropriate for posting on public forums.
James R said:For the record, Ron's temporary banning was not at the behest of water. In fact, water has made determined efforts to stay away from this forum for a while. Ron was previously warned about his stalking behaviour, but he still doesn't seem to have got the message. And now, it seems, you are acting as his proxy.
I now ask you to cease and desist this roundabout harassment of water, or I will be forced to ban you as well. No member of sciforums deserves this kind of stalking attention.
water said:I posted information on him breeching the copyright law because I wanted to show that he himself does not respect it -- while crying foul when others don't.
What part of 'leave the poor woman alone' escapes you?We have also found the time now to check our e-mail archive, and discovered what appears to be a remarkably specific permission to scan some photos. To jog her memory, "water" sent us that e-mail, 22nd May, with regard to uploads to flickr.com