Continental Drift Hypothesis

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you mean you are going to get started, yes?
Formation and drift of continents.
Nanotechnology Society of Russia. https://rusnor.org/pubs/articles/28319.htm

The Earth's crust, in the early stages of its evolution, was boiling magma, the poles of which, after a decrease in axial velocity and as a consequence of the Earth's geological activity, began to cool.
Then, the cooled magma in the form of continents, under the action of centrifugal forces, began to drift from the poles to the equator.
Then the continents, under the influence of the western transfer of the atmosphere along the hot magma, floated from west to east - like an iceberg in the ocean. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceberg
As soon as the crust formed at the poles of the Earth, magmatic gases began to accumulate under the crust, due to which geological activity of the continents began, and the buoyancy of the continents also increased.
The height of the continents above the magma level increases due to faults and microcracks that form as a result of explosions of magmatic gases.
Magmatic gases, collecting between the earth's crust and magma, form a gas layer (foam), due to which the earth's crust does not overheat and the magma does not cool.
The geological activity of planets and satellites depends on the axial and orbital velocity, as well as on the diameter and tilt of the axis. Magma circulation also makes its contribution. https://bigenc.ru/c/pemza-310720
The main reason for continental drift is the polar winds, which constantly move towards the equator, and today the polar winds, with an average annual speed of 20 m/s, and in gusts of more than 100 m/s, move huge icebergs towards the equator.
On Neptune, the wind speed reaches 600 m/s.
The continents drift also due to the imbalance between centrifugal and gravitational forces, and the greater the axial velocity of the Earth, the greater the imbalance of centrifugal and gravitational forces.
The polar compression of the Earth also contributes.
If the water in which an iceberg is drifting at a speed of 15 cm/year freezes, by how much will the speed of the iceberg decrease?
https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblate_spheroid
At the dawn of the formation of the earth's crust, the continents of the Arctic and Antarctica were formed at the North and South Poles.
The Arctic, drifting towards the equator, split into two continents - Eurasia and North America, between which the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans appeared.
As Eurasia moved south, Scandinavia fell behind Eurasia, resulting in the formation of the Baltic Sea.
Victoria Island also lagged behind North America.
I believe that North America, Baffin Island, Greenland and Scandinavia were close together as they moved towards the equator.
https://images.app.goo.gl/wjcDkrFzeBmShb5X8
The area of the continents of the Southern Hemisphere is much smaller than that of the Northern Hemisphere.
It is possible that Antarctica, due to early and high geological activity, did not completely leave the pole.
There is a high probability that Australia, drifting from west to east, also "rotated" around its axis.
https://images.app.goo.gl/FfcuHB32p2eeFF1q6
At one stage of its evolution, the hot Earth cooled and became covered with a crust, as a result of which pressure appeared in the bowels of the Earth due to the degassing of magma, and as a consequence, cracks formed on the Earth, from which mountain systems and ocean ridges then grew.
The low geological activity of the ocean ridges and the ocean floor is explained by the fact that water penetrates into the faults and microcracks of the ocean ridges and the ocean floor.
Having penetrated the faults, water displaces magmatic gases from the faults, thereby reducing the geological activity of ocean ridges and the ocean floor, due to which the thickness of the oceanic crust does not increase. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_crust
As the Earth cooled, the average air temperature on Earth dropped to 20 degrees, resulting in favorable climatic conditions for the emergence of life.
The first plants and animals appeared on Earth beyond the Arctic Circle and high in the mountains; in the middle latitudes and at the equator, due to high temperatures, conditions for the emergence of life remained unfavorable.
As the Earth's axial velocity decreased, the Earth's geological activity also decreased, causing the average air temperature on Earth to drop from 20 to 15 degrees.
When the air temperature dropped to 15 degrees, due to the cold snap, animals from the Arctic and highland regions migrated to the middle latitudes, and the vegetation and the Arctic Ocean froze.
Temperatures in the Arctic Circle could have dropped even after the tilt of the Earth's axis decreased from 30 to 23 degrees. https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origine_de_la_vie
According to the three-body problem, the "sharp cooling" on Earth occurred when the Moon formed from the Earth's rings, causing the axial velocity to decrease, and as a consequence, the Earth's geological activity to decrease.
After the Earth's geological activity decreased, the average air temperature on Earth also decreased.
According to the law of interaction of three bodies: The Earth is rotated by the western transfer of the atmosphere, then the axial velocity of the Earth is transformed into the orbital velocity of the Earth, then the orbital velocity of the Earth is transformed into the axial and orbital velocity of the Moon.
If the kinetic energy of the Earth's rotation did not transform into orbital energy, the Earth would continue to gain momentum and capsize. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem
During the formation of the continents, ocean basins were also formed, in which rainwater began to collect as the Earth cooled.
The torrential rains that fell continuously for millions of years during the early stages of the formation of the earth's crust also contributed to the formation of the earth's crust, changing the landscape of mountains and plains beyond recognition.
It is possible that lakes, bays and rivers are the result of heavy rains.
In the early stages of the formation of the earth's crust, sediment carried by ocean currents could settle near groups of volcanic islands.
The amount of sediment in water depends on the axial and orbital velocity of the Earth, on the speed of movement of water and air masses, and also on the speed of rotation of whirlpools.
It is possible that the vertical movement of ocean waters occurs due to whirlpools, which, having the properties of a gyroscope, maintain the vertical position of the axis in space regardless of the rotation of the Earth, and as a result contribute to the formation of continents and oceans. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch

Continued: Forum On the flagship. https://vmf.net.ru/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2328
Astronomical forum "AstroTalk". https://astrotalk.ru/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10510
 
Where did Venus' axial velocity go and how does the Sun rotate itself?
The angular momentum of all bodies in the solar system, including the sun, comes from the angular momentum of the cloud of dust and gas from which they formed. Since angular momentum is conserved, as both linear momentum and energy also are, it can't disappear.

I'm not sure what mean by the "axial velocity" of Venus. I'd have thought its velocity along its axis of rotation with respect to the sun must be zero, when averaged over a complete orbit.
 
The angular momentum of all bodies in the solar system, including the sun, comes from the angular momentum of the cloud of dust and gas from which they formed. Since angular momentum is conserved, as both linear momentum and energy also are, it can't disappear.
11. Further, as they approach the Sun, the axial and orbital speed of the planets and satellites increases, causing the satellites to fall out of orbit and the planets to tip over. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_racket_theorem
When a planet comes very close to the Sun, the geological activity of the planets increases, for this reason an explosion of a combustible mixture occurs in the planets' faults, and as a result the planet is destroyed into fragments, which, rotating around the Sun at a speed of about 100 km/sec, overturn and break into pieces, similar to Comet Shoemaker-Levy.
Then, rotating around the Sun, fragments of planets and satellites crash into the surface of the Sun, due to which the axial velocity of the Sun increases.
During the overturning, planet fragments are easily torn apart, since planet fragments do not have a magnetic field and are not ice blocks.

12. The radius of the solar system depends on the speed of light, the radius of the Sun, and the axial velocity of the Sun.
R ≈ c•r/ω
The speed of light is ≈ 1,000,000,000 km/h.
The radius of the Sun is ≈ 700,000 km.
The linear velocity of rotation of the Sun is ≈ 7000 km/h.
The radius of the Solar System is ≈ 1,000,000,000,000 km.
Due to the Coriolis force of the Sun, the Solar System is not scattered in space, but has the shape of a sphere. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere
https://www.sciforums.com/threads/stationary-model-of-the-solar-system.166203/
 
Last edited:
When a planet comes very close to the Sun, the geological activity of the planets increases, for this reason an explosion of a combustible mixture occurs in the planets' faults, and as a result the planet is destroyed into fragments, which, rotating around the Sun at a speed of about 100 km/sec, overturn and break into pieces, similar to Comet Shoemaker-Levy.
Then, rotating around the Sun, fragments of planets and satellites crash into the surface of the Sun, due to which the axial velocity of the Sun increases. https://www.sciforums.com/threads/stationary-model-of-the-solar-system.166203/
More mad nonsense.
 
Tidal drag, between the moon and the Earth. This very slowly transfers angular momentum from the more rapidly rotating Earth to the more slowly orbiting moon. In consequence it moves to a progressively higher orbit, while the rotation rate of the Earth very slowly decreases, i.e. the length of the day increases.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_acceleration
Just to add a bit more on this the orbital velocity of the moon, as it gradually recedes from the Earth, actually declines as its orbital angular momentum increases.

This can appear paradoxical, until one recalls that angular momentum goes up with the square of the radius.
 
How many centimeters per year do artificial satellites move away from the Earth?
 
Last edited:
How many centimeters per year do artificial satellites move away from the Earth?
They don't, as a rule. Firstly they don't have enough mass for tidal effects and secondly they are often sufficiently close in that they get gradually slowed down by tenuous traces of atmosphere, causing their orbits to "decay" over time.
 
If it were not for the Sun's Coriolis force, Halley's Comet would have fallen into the Sun.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halley's_Comet
Everything that approaches the Sun, thanks to the Coriolis force of the Sun, begins to move around the Sun.
When the planet Earth, moving in an ellipse, begins to approach the Sun, the Coriolis force of the Sun is activated.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force
OK, so no, you don't know what the Coriolis Force is.

Look, the Coriolis Force only acts locally, when one is on the surface of a rotating object. It does not act out in space.

The trajectories of celestial objects in the Solar system are controlled by one force and one force only - and that's gravity.

Not only do we know that gravity is the cause of the trajectories of solar system objects, but if there were an additional force, we would see a deviation from elliptical orbits, and the bodies would not be stable - they'd be quickly pulled oiut of their stable orbits and careen around the solar system.
 
Halley's Comet is an object orbiting the Sun.
As exchemist said...

To elaborate:
Halley's comet orbits the sun in an elliptical orbit, which is perfectly described by gravity alone. If there were any other force involved, it would not follow this stable elliptical path, and we would see this deviation quite easily. It would throw off Halley's orbit quite obviously.

Since we do not see any deviation from a path that is perfectly described by the sun's gravity, it's impossible for there to be another force.

As with Halley's comet, so it must be with every other solar system body: there can be no other force influencing them, or they could not be follow the exact paths set by gravity.
 
Last edited:
If it were not for the Sun's Coriolis force, Halley's Comet would have fallen into the Sun.
Nope. It would be in the same orbit no matter which way the Sun was spinning. Even if it was stationary

Everything that approaches the Sun, thanks to the Coriolis force of the Sun, begins to move around the Sun.

Nope. If you drop a marble with zero orbital velocity from 93 million miles, it will fall straight into the Sun.

When the planet Earth, moving in an ellipse, begins to approach the Sun, the Coriolis force of the Sun is activated.

Nope. Coriolis force acts on the surface of the rotating body, not on objects orbiting them. Sorry!
 
If it were not for the Sun's Coriolis force, Halley's Comet would have fallen into the Sun.
You and your "research group" should go back to university (or go for the first time, perhaps) and learn some basic physics, Fermer05.

There's no point trying to talk about Coriolis force before you understand what it is or when it applies or how it works. You only end up making yourself look as silly as you have here.
Everything that approaches the Sun, thanks to the Coriolis force of the Sun, begins to move around the Sun.
It sounds like you don't know the difference between gravitational force and Coriolis force, Fermer05. That's a rookie error. Back to school with you, before you embarrass yourself further with this pseudoscience of yours!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top