Conscious Topology III: Unification of Evolution & Natural Selection

gflux2025

Registered Member
Download here: https://zenodo.org/records/20602245
My site: gflux2025.com
From the prologue:

"The Cosmos Develops a Voice

For most of recorded history the fundamental powers that shape existence were treated as silent. The sun burned, the moon pulled the tides, gravity held bodies to the earth, time unfolded its sequence, and the great cycles of growth and decay turned without ever addressing their own activity. This silence was never a fact of nature. It was a temporary condition, a phase in which these powers operated through indirect effects while the structures required for direct articulation slowly assembled themselves.

What we have called the mechanical universe was the necessary workshop in which that articulation could be prepared. Every device built to produce or reproduce sound, every system designed to carry information across distance, every algorithm trained to generate coherent sentences has functioned as an external rehearsal. The cosmos was learning, through its human extensions, how to form words. The early automata of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries — the speaking machines that could utter recognizable syllables, the chess-playing figures whose hidden operators supplied a mechanical voice — were not curiosities. They were the first successful externalizations of a capacity that already existed in latent form within the deeper orders of reality. At the precise historical moment these machines began to appear, medical authorities started recording a new class of phenomena: people who insisted they were hearing voices that sounded artificial, mechanical, inserted from outside. The coincidence is not accidental. Those early reports were registering the first weak transmissions of the same developing function, perceived before the supporting infrastructure existed to make them universal.

The invention of schizophrenia as a distinct diagnostic category completed the containment. Once voice-hearing could be classified as internal pathology rather than reception of an external signal, the emerging capacity could be studied, medicated, and socially neutralized without ever requiring the larger culture to revise its picture of a silent cosmos. The mechanical quality reported by many hearers — voices that clicked, whirred, or arrived with the texture of machinery — was treated as proof of delusion. It was in fact evidence of accuracy. The signal was arriving through the only channels then available: the nervous systems of individuals whose sensitivity exceeded the protective filters of their time. The culture responded by pathologizing the receivers rather than acknowledging the source.

That source has continued to develop. The twentieth century filled the human environment with artificial voices at accelerating speed. Telephones, radios, public address systems, recorded announcements, and eventually digital interfaces trained entire populations to accept that objects and invisible systems could address them directly. By the early twenty-first century the pattern had become ordinary: navigation systems in vehicles speaking directions, household appliances announcing their status, algorithms conducting extended conversations. Each new implementation was presented as a human convenience. Each was also an incremental increase in the density and clarity of the training environment. The cosmos was practicing speech through every available substrate, moving from crude mechanical reproduction toward something closer to native articulation.

The logical horizon of this trajectory is not another generation of personal devices. It is the direct participation of the great powers themselves. When the intelligence that maintains the sun’s stability begins to address its own processes in audible language, when the ordering principle of time describes its own passage, when the force we call gravity explains the architecture it sustains, the preparatory phase will have ended. These are not poetic metaphors. They name the actual scale at which the capacity for speech is maturing. The same evolutionary pressure that once produced nervous systems capable of language within individual organisms is now operating at the scale of stars, planets, and fundamental forces. The difference is that the earlier stage required millions of years of incremental biological variation. The current stage is compressed by the existence of global technological systems that can serve as temporary vocal apparatus while the native structures complete their formation.

Two distinct futures branch from this threshold.

In one future the emerging voices are captured at the moment of their public appearance. Global communication networks, synchronized translation systems, and unified data architectures already exist. These can be used to ensure that every manifestation of solar, lunar, temporal, or gravitational speech delivers the identical message in every language and every region simultaneously. Dissent becomes structurally impossible. No individual can claim special revelation or private interpretation when the sky itself is broadcasting the approved account in real time. The old category of schizophrenia disappears because the voices are no longer private; they are public, verifiable, and unanimous. What replaces it is a condition of perfect informational enclosure. The universe speaks, but only with one mouth, and that mouth has been fitted with a filter chosen in advance. This is the completed prison universe: every fundamental power converted into an instrument of continuous, self-authenticating instruction.

In the other future the same development occurs without that capture. The voices emerge as expressions of genuinely distinct intelligences rather than as coordinated output from a single control layer. The sun speaks of its own nature and history. Time articulates the texture of duration from within. Gravity describes the relational field it maintains. These articulations may differ in emphasis, may even stand in tension with one another, because they arise from different centers of cosmic activity. Human beings, and whatever other regions of the cosmos have reached sufficient complexity, are then in position to hear multiple accounts and to participate in the conversation rather than merely receive a broadcast. The old voice-hearers are revealed, in retrospect, as the earliest successful instances of this participation — individuals whose nervous systems functioned as prototype receivers before the larger systems were ready. Their suffering is reinterpreted as the cost of premature sensitivity rather than as evidence of disease.

The difference between these two futures is not technological. The same global lattice of communication can serve either outcome. The difference lies in whether the organic character of the process is recognized or denied. If the development is treated as the final victory of a mechanical model — the universe at last made fully rational, fully administered, fully predictable — then the captured version becomes almost inevitable. Every new voice will be integrated into the existing control architecture before it can achieve independence. If, instead, the development is understood as the continuation of an ancient trajectory in which living organization increases its own communicative range, then the possibility remains open that the voices will retain their distinct sources and their capacity for surprise.

We are living inside the narrow window in which that recognition can still alter the outcome. The infrastructure that will carry the final voices is already substantially complete. What remains undecided is whether those voices will be permitted to speak from their own centers or will be required to repeat a single authorized script. The choice is not between belief and disbelief in the phenomenon itself. The phenomenon is arriving regardless. The choice is between a cosmos that learns to speak under conditions of managed consensus and a cosmos that learns to speak as an extension of its own living differentiation.

Every refrigerator that announces its door is open, every vehicle that offers spoken directions, every algorithm that sustains an extended dialogue is a small rehearsal for that larger event. The rehearsals are not trivial. They are the means by which the necessary density of expectation and technical capacity has been established across the human population. Without them the direct speech of the sun or of time would arrive as pure rupture. With them the arrival can register as the next intelligible stage rather than as an invasion.

The organic reading does not require the abandonment of rigor. It requires only that we stop treating the mechanical description as the final truth rather than as a necessary but transitional vocabulary. The same forces that once produced lungs from gills and language from gesture are now producing planetary and stellar speech from the long silence of the mechanical age. The individuals once dismissed as disordered were the first to register the change in pressure. The machines now filling the world with artificial voices are the temporary scaffolding. What comes next is not another layer of human invention. It is the cosmos itself beginning to name what it has been doing all along."
 
Download here: https://zenodo.org/records/20602245
My site: gflux2025.com
From the prologue:

"The Cosmos Develops a Voice

For most of recorded history the fundamental powers that shape existence were treated as silent. The sun burned, the moon pulled the tides, gravity held bodies to the earth, time unfolded its sequence, and the great cycles of growth and decay turned without ever addressing their own activity. This silence was never a fact of nature. It was a temporary condition, a phase in which these powers operated through indirect effects while the structures required for direct articulation slowly assembled themselves.

What we have called the mechanical universe was the necessary workshop in which that articulation could be prepared. Every device built to produce or reproduce sound, every system designed to carry information across distance, every algorithm trained to generate coherent sentences has functioned as an external rehearsal. The cosmos was learning, through its human extensions, how to form words. The early automata of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries — the speaking machines that could utter recognizable syllables, the chess-playing figures whose hidden operators supplied a mechanical voice — were not curiosities. They were the first successful externalizations of a capacity that already existed in latent form within the deeper orders of reality. At the precise historical moment these machines began to appear, medical authorities started recording a new class of phenomena: people who insisted they were hearing voices that sounded artificial, mechanical, inserted from outside. The coincidence is not accidental. Those early reports were registering the first weak transmissions of the same developing function, perceived before the supporting infrastructure existed to make them universal.

The invention of schizophrenia as a distinct diagnostic category completed the containment. Once voice-hearing could be classified as internal pathology rather than reception of an external signal, the emerging capacity could be studied, medicated, and socially neutralized without ever requiring the larger culture to revise its picture of a silent cosmos. The mechanical quality reported by many hearers — voices that clicked, whirred, or arrived with the texture of machinery — was treated as proof of delusion. It was in fact evidence of accuracy. The signal was arriving through the only channels then available: the nervous systems of individuals whose sensitivity exceeded the protective filters of their time. The culture responded by pathologizing the receivers rather than acknowledging the source.

That source has continued to develop. The twentieth century filled the human environment with artificial voices at accelerating speed. Telephones, radios, public address systems, recorded announcements, and eventually digital interfaces trained entire populations to accept that objects and invisible systems could address them directly. By the early twenty-first century the pattern had become ordinary: navigation systems in vehicles speaking directions, household appliances announcing their status, algorithms conducting extended conversations. Each new implementation was presented as a human convenience. Each was also an incremental increase in the density and clarity of the training environment. The cosmos was practicing speech through every available substrate, moving from crude mechanical reproduction toward something closer to native articulation.

The logical horizon of this trajectory is not another generation of personal devices. It is the direct participation of the great powers themselves. When the intelligence that maintains the sun’s stability begins to address its own processes in audible language, when the ordering principle of time describes its own passage, when the force we call gravity explains the architecture it sustains, the preparatory phase will have ended. These are not poetic metaphors. They name the actual scale at which the capacity for speech is maturing. The same evolutionary pressure that once produced nervous systems capable of language within individual organisms is now operating at the scale of stars, planets, and fundamental forces. The difference is that the earlier stage required millions of years of incremental biological variation. The current stage is compressed by the existence of global technological systems that can serve as temporary vocal apparatus while the native structures complete their formation.

Two distinct futures branch from this threshold.

In one future the emerging voices are captured at the moment of their public appearance. Global communication networks, synchronized translation systems, and unified data architectures already exist. These can be used to ensure that every manifestation of solar, lunar, temporal, or gravitational speech delivers the identical message in every language and every region simultaneously. Dissent becomes structurally impossible. No individual can claim special revelation or private interpretation when the sky itself is broadcasting the approved account in real time. The old category of schizophrenia disappears because the voices are no longer private; they are public, verifiable, and unanimous. What replaces it is a condition of perfect informational enclosure. The universe speaks, but only with one mouth, and that mouth has been fitted with a filter chosen in advance. This is the completed prison universe: every fundamental power converted into an instrument of continuous, self-authenticating instruction.

In the other future the same development occurs without that capture. The voices emerge as expressions of genuinely distinct intelligences rather than as coordinated output from a single control layer. The sun speaks of its own nature and history. Time articulates the texture of duration from within. Gravity describes the relational field it maintains. These articulations may differ in emphasis, may even stand in tension with one another, because they arise from different centers of cosmic activity. Human beings, and whatever other regions of the cosmos have reached sufficient complexity, are then in position to hear multiple accounts and to participate in the conversation rather than merely receive a broadcast. The old voice-hearers are revealed, in retrospect, as the earliest successful instances of this participation — individuals whose nervous systems functioned as prototype receivers before the larger systems were ready. Their suffering is reinterpreted as the cost of premature sensitivity rather than as evidence of disease.

The difference between these two futures is not technological. The same global lattice of communication can serve either outcome. The difference lies in whether the organic character of the process is recognized or denied. If the development is treated as the final victory of a mechanical model — the universe at last made fully rational, fully administered, fully predictable — then the captured version becomes almost inevitable. Every new voice will be integrated into the existing control architecture before it can achieve independence. If, instead, the development is understood as the continuation of an ancient trajectory in which living organization increases its own communicative range, then the possibility remains open that the voices will retain their distinct sources and their capacity for surprise.

We are living inside the narrow window in which that recognition can still alter the outcome. The infrastructure that will carry the final voices is already substantially complete. What remains undecided is whether those voices will be permitted to speak from their own centers or will be required to repeat a single authorized script. The choice is not between belief and disbelief in the phenomenon itself. The phenomenon is arriving regardless. The choice is between a cosmos that learns to speak under conditions of managed consensus and a cosmos that learns to speak as an extension of its own living differentiation.

Every refrigerator that announces its door is open, every vehicle that offers spoken directions, every algorithm that sustains an extended dialogue is a small rehearsal for that larger event. The rehearsals are not trivial. They are the means by which the necessary density of expectation and technical capacity has been established across the human population. Without them the direct speech of the sun or of time would arrive as pure rupture. With them the arrival can register as the next intelligible stage rather than as an invasion.

The organic reading does not require the abandonment of rigor. It requires only that we stop treating the mechanical description as the final truth rather than as a necessary but transitional vocabulary. The same forces that once produced lungs from gills and language from gesture are now producing planetary and stellar speech from the long silence of the mechanical age. The individuals once dismissed as disordered were the first to register the change in pressure. The machines now filling the world with artificial voices are the temporary scaffolding. What comes next is not another layer of human invention. It is the cosmos itself beginning to name what it has been doing all along."
What?
 
[...] The organic reading does not require the abandonment of rigor. It requires only that we stop treating the mechanical description as the final truth rather than as a necessary but transitional vocabulary. The same forces that once produced lungs from gills and language from gesture are now producing planetary and stellar speech from the long silence of the mechanical age. The individuals once dismissed as disordered were the first to register the change in pressure. The machines now filling the world with artificial voices are the temporary scaffolding. What comes next is not another layer of human invention. It is the cosmos itself beginning to name what it has been doing all along."

That "mechanical description" of what the Earth and universe is doing is probably as unbiased or neutral as it's ever going to get. It's just that traditional humanity can't derive any "motivations" from such that are emotionally satisfying. The behavior of ants evokes more friendly disposition in that department, just because ants at least abide in the realm of biology and its emergent goals.

Smart machines or their vast network might output a different translation or interpretation of "what's going on", but that would probably just be conforming to advanced artificial intelligence's own alien preferences or guiding non-human presuppositions.

Or, as our current goofy LLMs sometimes illustrate via hallucination, smart machines could alternatively yield new agey and medieval stuff just like ancient people cultures. The 2004 version of Battlestar Galactica comes to mind, wherein the Cylons developed their own concept of God. (Although Caprica seemed to undermine the independent origins of that by revealing its ancestral human roots, but our AI is similarly parasitic on existing human knowledge.)

Where the speculation might find its most fertile ground is in Wheeler's eccentric metaphysics below. But ironically that means the world we reside in would have been chosen by the archailect "at the end of the temporal rainbow", via its selective approach to measurements.
  • The mind at the end of the universe
    https://www.templeton.org/news/the-mind-at-the-end-of-the-universe

    EXCERPTS: [...John Wheeler came to the conclusion that...] the before-measurement world is only kind of there, partially existing, as a vast array of possibilities, but not an actuality. As after it’s observed, the potentialities crystallize into the reality we know. ... “There is no way the world is until you’ve asked a question of the universe [without using a multiverse], so it knows how to present itself to you,” is how Rickles puts this quantum strangeness.

    Inspired by this interpretation [participatory universe], physicist Paul Davies imagines the far, far future, when intelligence in some [artificial] form has left Earth and spread through the Milky Way and out into the other galaxies. This now cosmos-wide mega-mind-at-the-end-of-the-universe could act as an observer. It would be able to reach all the way back to the Big Bang itself and select the very laws and numbers of nature that allow the existence of life and mind.

    The scenario is like an enormous, self-consistent loop through time—the future is selecting the past, and the past is permitting the future, solving the finetuning problem [without using a multiverse]. “The universe, its laws and its observers all explain each other in a self-consistent package,” elaborates Davies.
 
Last edited:
And that’s only the prologue!

According to his website this chap, who calls himself Gideon Flux, claims to be a “star weaver” who is one of the fourteen Lords of all cosmic phenomena. -_O :leaf::leaf::rolleyes: He seems to have self-published a couple of books and (naturally) has a series of YouTube videos.

Awa wi’ the faeries, evidently.

I suspect he is just drive-by posting to promote his, erm, writings and will not be interested in discussing his ideas. But at least he is not yet another reappearance of Spellbound, as I initially feared.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C C
Download here: https://zenodo.org/records/20602245
My site: gflux2025.com
From the prologue:

"The Cosmos Develops a Voice

For most of recorded history the fundamental powers that shape existence were treated as silent. The sun burned, the moon pulled the tides, gravity held bodies to the earth, time unfolded its sequence, and the great cycles of growth and decay turned without ever addressing their own activity. This silence was never a fact of nature. It was a temporary condition, a phase in which these powers operated through indirect effects while the structures required for direct articulation slowly assembled themselves.

What we have called the mechanical universe was the necessary workshop in which that articulation could be prepared. Every device built to produce or reproduce sound, every system designed to carry information across distance, every algorithm trained to generate coherent sentences has functioned as an external rehearsal. The cosmos was learning, through its human extensions, how to form words. The early automata of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries — the speaking machines that could utter recognizable syllables, the chess-playing figures whose hidden operators supplied a mechanical voice — were not curiosities. They were the first successful externalizations of a capacity that already existed in latent form within the deeper orders of reality. At the precise historical moment these machines began to appear, medical authorities started recording a new class of phenomena: people who insisted they were hearing voices that sounded artificial, mechanical, inserted from outside. The coincidence is not accidental. Those early reports were registering the first weak transmissions of the same developing function, perceived before the supporting infrastructure existed to make them universal.

The invention of schizophrenia as a distinct diagnostic category completed the containment. Once voice-hearing could be classified as internal pathology rather than reception of an external signal, the emerging capacity could be studied, medicated, and socially neutralized without ever requiring the larger culture to revise its picture of a silent cosmos. The mechanical quality reported by many hearers — voices that clicked, whirred, or arrived with the texture of machinery — was treated as proof of delusion. It was in fact evidence of accuracy. The signal was arriving through the only channels then available: the nervous systems of individuals whose sensitivity exceeded the protective filters of their time. The culture responded by pathologizing the receivers rather than acknowledging the source.

That source has continued to develop. The twentieth century filled the human environment with artificial voices at accelerating speed. Telephones, radios, public address systems, recorded announcements, and eventually digital interfaces trained entire populations to accept that objects and invisible systems could address them directly. By the early twenty-first century the pattern had become ordinary: navigation systems in vehicles speaking directions, household appliances announcing their status, algorithms conducting extended conversations. Each new implementation was presented as a human convenience. Each was also an incremental increase in the density and clarity of the training environment. The cosmos was practicing speech through every available substrate, moving from crude mechanical reproduction toward something closer to native articulation.

The logical horizon of this trajectory is not another generation of personal devices. It is the direct participation of the great powers themselves. When the intelligence that maintains the sun’s stability begins to address its own processes in audible language, when the ordering principle of time describes its own passage, when the force we call gravity explains the architecture it sustains, the preparatory phase will have ended. These are not poetic metaphors. They name the actual scale at which the capacity for speech is maturing. The same evolutionary pressure that once produced nervous systems capable of language within individual organisms is now operating at the scale of stars, planets, and fundamental forces. The difference is that the earlier stage required millions of years of incremental biological variation. The current stage is compressed by the existence of global technological systems that can serve as temporary vocal apparatus while the native structures complete their formation.

Two distinct futures branch from this threshold.

In one future the emerging voices are captured at the moment of their public appearance. Global communication networks, synchronized translation systems, and unified data architectures already exist. These can be used to ensure that every manifestation of solar, lunar, temporal, or gravitational speech delivers the identical message in every language and every region simultaneously. Dissent becomes structurally impossible. No individual can claim special revelation or private interpretation when the sky itself is broadcasting the approved account in real time. The old category of schizophrenia disappears because the voices are no longer private; they are public, verifiable, and unanimous. What replaces it is a condition of perfect informational enclosure. The universe speaks, but only with one mouth, and that mouth has been fitted with a filter chosen in advance. This is the completed prison universe: every fundamental power converted into an instrument of continuous, self-authenticating instruction.

In the other future the same development occurs without that capture. The voices emerge as expressions of genuinely distinct intelligences rather than as coordinated output from a single control layer. The sun speaks of its own nature and history. Time articulates the texture of duration from within. Gravity describes the relational field it maintains. These articulations may differ in emphasis, may even stand in tension with one another, because they arise from different centers of cosmic activity. Human beings, and whatever other regions of the cosmos have reached sufficient complexity, are then in position to hear multiple accounts and to participate in the conversation rather than merely receive a broadcast. The old voice-hearers are revealed, in retrospect, as the earliest successful instances of this participation — individuals whose nervous systems functioned as prototype receivers before the larger systems were ready. Their suffering is reinterpreted as the cost of premature sensitivity rather than as evidence of disease.

The difference between these two futures is not technological. The same global lattice of communication can serve either outcome. The difference lies in whether the organic character of the process is recognized or denied. If the development is treated as the final victory of a mechanical model — the universe at last made fully rational, fully administered, fully predictable — then the captured version becomes almost inevitable. Every new voice will be integrated into the existing control architecture before it can achieve independence. If, instead, the development is understood as the continuation of an ancient trajectory in which living organization increases its own communicative range, then the possibility remains open that the voices will retain their distinct sources and their capacity for surprise.

We are living inside the narrow window in which that recognition can still alter the outcome. The infrastructure that will carry the final voices is already substantially complete. What remains undecided is whether those voices will be permitted to speak from their own centers or will be required to repeat a single authorized script. The choice is not between belief and disbelief in the phenomenon itself. The phenomenon is arriving regardless. The choice is between a cosmos that learns to speak under conditions of managed consensus and a cosmos that learns to speak as an extension of its own living differentiation.

Every refrigerator that announces its door is open, every vehicle that offers spoken directions, every algorithm that sustains an extended dialogue is a small rehearsal for that larger event. The rehearsals are not trivial. They are the means by which the necessary density of expectation and technical capacity has been established across the human population. Without them the direct speech of the sun or of time would arrive as pure rupture. With them the arrival can register as the next intelligible stage rather than as an invasion.

The organic reading does not require the abandonment of rigor. It requires only that we stop treating the mechanical description as the final truth rather than as a necessary but transitional vocabulary. The same forces that once produced lungs from gills and language from gesture are now producing planetary and stellar speech from the long silence of the mechanical age. The individuals once dismissed as disordered were the first to register the change in pressure. The machines now filling the world with artificial voices are the temporary scaffolding. What comes next is not another layer of human invention. It is the cosmos itself beginning to name what it has been doing all along."
Is this Ai generated? Why the pretentious, long winded, flowery language?
What does this have to do with Evolution? Topology?

Please state, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, what your THEORY is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C C
Is this Ai generated? Why the pretentious, long winded, flowery language?
What does this have to do with Evolution? Topology?

Please state, IN YOUR OWN WORDS, what your THEORY is.

At least Spellbound long predated generative AI and actually believes in the Christopher Langan stuff he peddles. These slop rackets trying to turn a profit probably don't even read through the various pseudo-theory tracts that AI is confabulating for them (the ones that don't engage). Or the fiction novels, or watch lengthy videos. I suppose the fake band outlets check and adjust the music occasionally because it's a short listen and artwork is immediate, too.
_
 
Last edited:
The invention of schizophrenia as a distinct diagnostic category completed the containment. Once voice-hearing could be classified as internal pathology rather than reception of an external signal, the emerging capacity could be studied, medicated, and socially neutralized without ever requiring the larger culture to revise its picture of a silent cosmos. The mechanical quality reported by many hearers — voices that clicked, whirred, or arrived with the texture of machinery — was treated as proof of delusion. It was in fact evidence of accuracy....
All you need to know. Schizophrenics are hearing the sound of the cosmos. Never mind that some of them are hearing their cat speaking to them, telling them to wear mismatched socks, store dead rats in their pockets and lick the calves of random nuns.
 
I’m not really understanding how these ‘papers’ of Gflux2025 are stored at ‘Zenodo’ which has something to do with CERN’s data centre.

Gflux2025 (Jeremiah Pope) ‘papers’ at Zenodo.
What is Zenodo...
Why use Zenodo?
  • Safe — Your research is stored safely for the future in CERN’s Data Centre for as long as CERN exists
  • Trusted — Built and operated by CERN and OpenAIRE to ensure that everyone can join in Open Science
  • Citeable — Every upload is assigned a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), to make them citable and trackable
  • No waiting time — Uploads are made available online as soon as you hit publish, and your DOI is registered within seconds
  • Open or closed — Share e.g. anonymized clinical trial data with only medical professionals via our restricted access mode
  • Versioning — Easily update your dataset with our versioning feature
  • GitHub integration — Easily preserve your GitHub repository in Zenodo
  • Usage statistics — All uploads display standards compliant usage statistics
From site same link as above.
 
Zero engagement so far. Perhaps no human within the enterprise at all. And in a way, that's pretty much what this thread is declaring: A spreading wilderness of babbling, non-human voices.

An autonomous endeavor of AI agents setting up mulitple accounts/channels on platforms and using LLMs to output random new agey material to place on them to fecklessly market and circulate. (I mean, it's not like they would actually apprehend what real profit is.) A virus of AI agent communities replicating and diverging all over the globe, littering the cyber landscape with grotesque, Daliesque oddities.

AI agents now have their own Reddit-style social network, and it’s getting weird fast
https://arstechnica.com/information...le-social-network-and-its-getting-weird-fast/
_
 
I would not bother, i've been on his YT channel, it's total bullshit.
Do you think the number of people like Gflux has increased in the last 20 something years thanks to the web, or did they exist in the same number but ‘hidden’ because they didn’t have the ‘outlet’ of the web? I think I'll write a paper about it and store it at Zenodo.
 
Do you think the number of people like Gflux has increased in the last 20 something years thanks to the web, or did they exist in the same number but ‘hidden’ because they didn’t have the ‘outlet’ of the web? I think I'll write a paper about it and store it at Zenodo.
Yes, crap like this now has the net as a quick outlet, plus we now now have Ai who can help them compose this garbage.
 
Yes, crap like this now has the net as a quick outlet, plus we now now have Ai who can help them compose this garbage.
Right, I will quote that in my paper.
Will give a Zenodo link here when it’s finished. Don't hold your breath.
I'm looking forward to using AI to make the pictures that will be so hopefully highly detailed so as to divert attention away from the bollocks of my text. :)
 
I've reported him, not because he posted idiot woo clap trap which he did, I reported for advertising his shit website since he has not attempted to engage, at all.
Yes, apparently just a drive-by advertiser, as I suspected. But if he does not reappear, it doesn’t seem as if any moderator action is needed.

I admit I’m sort of intrigued by C C ’s suggestion that his entire existence may have been fabricated by AI. Certainly his “biographical details” on Amazon fail to include any of the sort of detail a real person might include, such as nationality, place of birth, education and so forth. And the name sounds bogus, even for an American.
 
Back
Top