When we have a site nominally about science that is populated by those who have never read a science textbook of any kind and the biggest concern is Seattle and his sincerity, something is wrong.
We should be clear, I provide content, you provide drama and where the science content should go there is little.We should be clear, then: You're a minor symptom.
I provide content,
why ? are you going to stop buying war bonds if the insane are not in control ?are the sane or insane managing the asylum. Sancho wants to know.
You're a minor symptom.
We should be clear, I provide content ....
When we have a site nominally about science that is populated by those who have never read a science textbook of any kind and the biggest concern is Seattle and his sincerity, something is wrong.
If I had to guess who was a paid propaganda poster on Sciforums you would be my only guess.
The post was replying to Paddoboy when he stated that he was an alter boy for years and he was never molested. Rather than specifically point out the obvious problems with that line of thinking I said, I guess you just weren't masculine enough as a kid.
It is a James spin-off thread as I recall and yes, it is boring.If I unearthed the underlying reasons for this thread, I probably get bored -it would ruin the mystery!
I guess you think you have contributed or added something? But, meh.Well ...
... sure ...
... if you say so …
... because, yeah, y'know, whatever.
A quick estimate: about 4/5 of the time he replies to or even refers to a post by iceaura, he's wrong about something central to his post - usually the content of the post he's replying to, the meaning of the words therein, but also quite often about some personal characteristic of the poster he somehow feels the need to claim or reference, the facts of some social matter tangentially relevant to the post, the history of the posting involved, etc.How often is he (Seattle) wrong about anything?
why ? are you going to stop buying war bonds if the insane are not in control ?
Living in the here and now? Good for you Sancho.Sancho has no investments in the past.
Mayo & SaladSancho has no investments in the past.
It is a James spin-off thread as I recall and yes, it is boring.
Mod Hat — But you wanted the attention
Policy note: Should I, then, recommend that in the future, we not split out people's complaints about moderation, like that, and simply issue infractions for off-topic posting? If we absolutely need to split out the disruption caused by such complaints, we can issue extra points.
Part of the point of asking is that moving your complaint here, to be considered, was apparently decided a better outcome than simply flagging your in-thread whining.
And if it turns out you're not bringing much for content, well, it's also true that generally isn't considered drama.
Meanwhile, is this thread over and done, then?
Pretty certain Sancho is a sock.Sancho is a good man.