I don't believe I have used anywhere that Abiogenesis is a simple process. And of course it has been 13.8 billion years. And I'm sure that it is not blurring the waters by stating that "at one time there was no life, then there was" And further that the only scientific answer to that is abiogenesis, encompassing a variable number of pathways. So far as I can see, we only have one active dissenter from the highlighted bit, speaking scientifically. I am ignoring at this time the semantics and pedant involved with Abiogenesis.