Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
You really do not learn do you?
This has been explained to you a Hundred times you stupid cretin.
STOP polluting the site.
Can Gravity be derived without using Newton's Gravitational constant?
- Thread starter quant
- Start date
This has been explained to you a Hundred times you stupid cretin.
STOP polluting the site.
river:
There are several different mechanisms. I will explain just one, for now.
If a moon of a planet gets closer to the planet than the Roche limit, then tidal gravitational forces will be strong enough to tear the moon apart. The resulting fragments orbit the planet at different speeds, because they are at different distances from the planet. Therefore, they tend to spread out. Collisions between fragments also homogenise the ring density over time.
Now, are you going to answer any of the direct questions I asked you previously in this thread?
I'm sure I already did this somewhere. Must be in a different thread.
There are several different mechanisms. I will explain just one, for now.
If a moon of a planet gets closer to the planet than the Roche limit, then tidal gravitational forces will be strong enough to tear the moon apart. The resulting fragments orbit the planet at different speeds, because they are at different distances from the planet. Therefore, they tend to spread out. Collisions between fragments also homogenise the ring density over time.
Now, are you going to answer any of the direct questions I asked you previously in this thread?
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Hahaha, you are treading the path trodden before by many others, myself included. It was the "water" thread that did it for me: https://www.sciforums.com/threads/has-there-been-an-improved-understanding-of-water.135771/
That was 12 years ago. Since then I've had this guy on Ignore most of the time. I like to end an internet session in a better mood than when I started, not a worse one.
