The question is moot
I think fate is only a useful idea if we ask the question 'what fate?', because then we would make a choice to accept or reject it. If we just 'let fate happen by itself' then it can't really be described as fate, just as 'what happened'. It cannot exist without looking back at it, so, like my 'patience principle', its existence depends on how we observe it.
The Bible doesn't differentiate between free will and predetermination. Since God knows everything, there can be no uncertaintly, and since He is not subjected to time, whether something has, is, or will happen is irrelevant to the outcome. According to the Bible the outcome is fixed. Our 'free will' consists of whether we choose accept that outcome or not, and our acceptance determines our inclusion or exclusion from that "fate".
Imagine you could avoid death. If everybody could avoid it, death wouldn't exist. Sin, as well: if everybody weren't able, willing, or wanting to sin, then sin would be scrapped from the dictionary. Does that mean death is predetermined, or sin is inevitable? So someone would have to 'choose' death, and 'conquer' sin, so that we were able to make the decision in the first place! People wouldn't have known this if Jesus didn't tell us this, so *even if* we could create God to fill voids and whatnot, we couldn't have expected what Jesus would do until after He'd done it, because we didn't have the choice. We had laws, why would anybody 'invent' Jesus? That is why the no-one can know God except through Jesus.