Yes. I am on a bit of a crusade to edumacate people about AI and other internet misinformation. I have a couple of threads here on SciFo about it.
And it speeds up. What took 5 years to penetrate the public consciousness now happens in six months. That is how exploitation stays ahead of shrewdness. A little like how criminals stay ahead of police.
The left cause 22% of terrorism. I need really hard data on that. Try the years 2022/23/24 say.
Even the correct numbers here, which are closer to 5 or 10 percent (at least according to the FBI) are deeply problematic due to broadened definitions for what constitutes "terrorism", particularly with respect to environmental and animal liberation activism. For instance, there are various AgGag laws which make photographing or filming on locations of animal agriculture or animal-based "research" terroristic acts, and even disrupting economic activities via means which wouuld be considered non-criminal, or misdemeanors at worst, within other contexts can be treated as terroristic actions.
This is ridiculous without even getting into whether it's "true" or not. There are no data reporting agencies, FBI, think tanks, whatever, that can or do categorize things like that. It's not even possible nor is it possible for people to agree on the definitions required for such a statement.
My (possibly notorious) test of AI a while back was to ask it how many hamsters would fill the SuperDome. It was unable to grapple with some basic aspects of packing, or compression in the lower layers. Hamsters are not rigid rectangles.
Look it up yourself. I did.
Wrong. You don't like it, so you don't except it. Typical.
Undefended assertion. Merely looking up any ol' answer is insufficient, if one's sources are not reliable and/or if other sources give different answers.
It's not a matter of not liking it. I don't have any vested interest in when crime is coming from. I'm fine with reality. This just isn't very well thought out.
Bullshit. You plugged some terms into a search bar and copy/pasted whatever AI nonsense appeared at the top of your screen. AI is frequently wrong--possibly even more wrong than it is right. Google AI once told me that 20 percent of Americans are underweight.
Yeah. While leftwing terrorism certainly exists, it's rather infrequent--especially in recent decades. And when it does occur, murder or the killing of people is extremely rare. In recent history--by which I mean the past half century--Luigi Mangione is the only leftwing "terrorist" I can even recall who has killed a person.
See what I added about sources.
Yeah, you said it "corresponds" with other sources. Just not any that I nor anyone else has seen. IOW it's bullshit and it's just plain incorrect.
And? Are you saying that you don't understand the "reality", because you can't seem to provide any sources for your specious claims?