I asked where do photons originate ?
What is the source of photons ?[/QUOTE]
There are lots of sources of photons. Light bulbs, for example. The sun. LEDs. And so on and so forth.
I asked where do photons originate ?
There are lots of sources of photons. Light bulbs, for example. The sun. LEDs. And so on and so forth.[/QUOTE]What is the source of photons ?
Wait until he finds out about the microwave background radiation.River believes that photons cannot exist without emanating from a physical object.
River believes that photons cannot exist without emanating from a physical object. He believes that matter is fundamental, and EM energy is a byproduct.[/QUOTE]There are lots of sources of photons. Light bulbs, for example. The sun. LEDs. And so on and so forth.
Or left over heat from the BB, and before the first element/s were created, and which was finally released at around 380,000 years after the BB, when temperatures had cooled sufficiently [3000K] to allow electrons to couple with atomic nuclei. But again, this will go in one ear and out the other, and will never make any difference to someone with a mindset that river has.Wait until he finds out about the microwave background radiation.
Energy is not a thing. Energy is a property of a thing.
A subatomic particle can have energy, but it cannot exist as energy.
I'm pretty familiar with subatomic particles.Check out subatomic particles, out there a it but worth entertaining.
They do. We've seen them.What if black holes don't exist?
What else could it be?
What else could what be? Black holes?
Black holes are ... black holes.
Are you asking what black holes could be, if they're not ... black holes?
Why?That's the question you should be asking.
Them are atomic.I'm pretty familiar with subatomic particles.
Protons, neutrons and electrons are pretty common, but there's lots more. Anything catch your fancy?
No. Them are subatomic.Them are atomic.
Any particle that makes up an atomic nucleus is subatomic....protons, neutrons, are subatomic as that is what an atomic nucleus is composed of.No. Them are subatomic.
There are lots of others; those just happen to be the most well-known.
Photons were created during the Photon Epoch - in the first ten seconds of the Big Bang. Atomic constituents came along much later.All from post # 81 through to post # 89 are based on the physical . Period .
Photons emanate from the physical object .
river said: ↑
All from post # 81 through to post # 89 are based on the physical . Period .
Photons emanate from the physical object .
Photons were created during the Photon Epoch - in the first ten seconds of the Big Bang. Atomic constituents came along much later.
The universe does not care what you believe.
The breaking of symmetry of the 4 fundamental forces following the Big Bang itself.What created these photons in this epoch ?
river said: ↑
What created these photons in this epoch ?
The breaking of symmetry of the 4 fundamental forces following the Big Bang itself.
Big Bang was not an explosion.BB is based on the physical .
The explosion .
Big Bang was not an explosion.
Put down the UFO book and pick up a high school science book.
If only!!!!Big Bang was not an explosion.
Put down the UFO book and pick up a high school science book.
BB is an explosion Theory of this Universe .
What science book have you read that says differently ; and has no physical aspect to this theory .
If BH's did not exist, scientists/cosmologists would have plenty of explaining to do, to explain the effects that we see in the vicinity of BHs. It would need to be something even more weirder and would probably undermine and discredit GR and the vast majority of our cosmological models.Check out subatomic particles, out there a bit but worth entertaining. What if black holes don't exist? What else could it be? That's the question you should be asking.
If BH's did not exist, scientists/cosmologists would have plenty of explaining to do, to explain the effects that we see in the vicinity of BHs. It would need to be something even more weirder and would probably undermine and discredit GR and the vast majority of our cosmological models.
The point is that at this time, BH's are as certain as any scientific theory can be, with the 14 or so listed collisions between BH binaries and the resultant gravitational radiation. Also even more recently the photo taken by the EHT.
BH's of sorts are actually even predicted to exist with Newtonian mechanics and was hypothesised by a bloke called John Michell as far back as 1783, basically by simply applying escape velocities and densities to surfaces of collapsed stars. When density as such, reaches "c" then even light cannot escape. This model though would have a surface just below the EH. Later of course GR told us that when the EH/Schwarzchild radius is reached, then further collapse is compulsory.
The story of how our universe evolved to what we see today, is partly reconstructed by observational data in particle accelerator experiments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe