But of course America will sort it out
3 different arguments
1 colonialism
2 drug war
3 terrorism war
regardless of 1 & 3
#2 will continue because it is their primary income
culturally you have the tali ban growing drugs to use as a religiously validated insult to alah as a weapon against their religious enemy
so they say its ok to grow popys and make heroin and sell it to christian infidels etc
etc etc
the dog biting its own tail running in circles barking
the cycle of power and control is self validating/perpetuating
interesting looking at 1 headline
how it was worded
"America lost the war"
lol if america used the same morality as the taliban the war would be over decades ago
the irony of modern civilized morality is the debate inside the usa in what type of war they engage in
part of the real story that is being kept out of the headlines by those who have a dollar t turn and a power position to exploit
is the reality that America cant control its own borders
so the opium & heroine keeps flowing in over their borders
but as long as it keeps coming in, they can validate their military presence in Afghanistan
How long have the groups in Afghanistan been fighting before America became involved?
how long is time ?
it has always been fought over as soon as any army becomes big enough to move long distances
much like africa so its now destabalised into a state of perpetual civil war as a normal culture
where only overt collective power of a unified military presence can protect peaceful existence and systems.
but no one wants a single leadership that is civilized and secular
its all based around fascist ideological religious cults.
I'm surprised America did think of my brilliant idea of how to wipe out the Taliban without being involved
giving self autonomy through supporting a leader who obliges all sides into discourse
they define that lack of blood lust to be a sign of weakness in many cultures
probably considerable rare earths in Afghanistan
what does a agrarian peasant farmer do with a pile of foreign currency in the middle of no where ?
without any of the behaviors being defined as overt or covert imperialism ?
the answer to the problem is sold as the problem needing an answer
an answer that must be delivered before the other questions are asked
should the world just wall off Afghanistan and ignore its presence and leave them to what they want ?
to be ignored ?
who is "they"
Chinese go to Afghanistan.
if they do, it will be for money
nothing less
and it will be to make things to sell to the west
so its china going to them
to get resources
to make things
to sell to the world
so its the world outsourcing going to them with china
china tend to give them things in exchange as opposed to the usa who offer to create political systems
china gives them assets like buildings and cash
usa gives them senate committees & a new class system for their old class system
