when you belittle the history of others as well as their suffering you should expect in return quit your bitching.
Banning SAM
- Thread starter CheskiChips
- Start date
- Status
Thats for the body this is for the mind.
HAHA you Must be a Muslim. I don't know a Christian or Jew practicing who would say such a sexist statement! :bugeye:
Looks like I can add Oli to the list of individuals who aren't worth having a discussion with. In case people are wondering, the list so far: Tiassa, S.A.M, James R, Oli.
never heard an evangelical christian now have you. and nice bigotry there. i am a non religous person who wants to be a wiccan
A girlfriend is for the mind also. Women think differently than men too. Would be good for you.
Why i have enough female friends i don't need a girl friend for that.
Yeah, anyone who tortures themselves (because that is what arguing with S.A.M is... torture) is a loser with no life. Only a loser would engage in an act which they don't enjoy, and which doesn't achieve anything.
Dale Carnegie was right regarding arguments. More often than not, the best way to win an argument is not to have one at all.
hahahahahahahaha Let's all take this guys opinion as if it mattered. What was it you wanted to be?
Don't they commit murder and sacrifices?
Wicca? give me a break.
? whatever is the matter with a religion that is peaceful and tolerant, like wicca?
Wiccans don't commit murder and sacrifices, dipshit.
And Muslims are the ones who claim their religion is slandered by ignorant individuals? FFS.
And Muslims are the ones who claim their religion is slandered by ignorant individuals? FFS.
That's your criterion of worth?
Being able to argue someone down without stretching yourself?
Cute.
I was merely refuting your moronic comment on me having to be a muslim.
could you possibly say anything more ignorant?
At least not these days...
Oli:
See what I mean, folks? The above misrepresentation is a good example of the dishonesty and presumptuousness one is forced to deal with when arguing with people like S.A.M.
See what I mean, folks? The above misrepresentation is a good example of the dishonesty and presumptuousness one is forced to deal with when arguing with people like S.A.M.
Misrepresentation?
Maybe a false assumption on my part, since I consider S.A.M.'s ability to argue a major point, so I had that in mind when I read your comment about me not "being worth" having a discussion with.
Do enlighten me as to why I'm not, since I'm obviously mistaken.
Last edited:
Challenger78
Valued Senior Member
If SAM gets banned, so should buffalo roam.
- Status