It is unecessary, counterproductive and utter folly for the USA to allow herself to be drawn into an absurdly retro colonial posture, right over a chopping block that all the world can see, excepting those individuals sufficiantly blinded by unjustifiable yet stupendous American hubris, complacency, self-centeredness, and (in face of the results)- denial.
For whitewolf, a little love in Hype's direction. This single sentence perfectly illustrates why I find him basically useless.
I'll break it down:
Opinion stated as fact and completely unfounded. Zero supporting argument.
Opinion stated as fact and completely unfounded. Zero supporting argument.
Opinion stated as fact and completely unfounded. Zero supporting argument.
for the USA to allow herself to be drawn
Wholly debatable since the US has taken an agressive role.
Opinion stated as fact and completely unfounded. Zero supporting argument.
UTTER NONSENSE, in complete denial of the fact that the countries sovereignty is being returned to them
this month. Further, US policy has not started shipping US citizens to colonize Iraq, nor have we claimed ownership of any of their resources.
right over a chopping block
Opinion stated as fact and completely unfounded. Zero supporting argument.
that all the world can see,
The world can see what we do. Many of them support our actions. Today's media is can be manipulated, but not shut down - so of course the world can see something. Of course, hype's narrow-minded, dogmatic position doesn't allow him to account for distortion in the media unless it strengthens, rather that diminishes his case.
excepting those individuals
of course the great master of dogma, hype himself is completely immune to the dangers his following complaints.
demonize the opposers. ad hominem? if they disagree, tell them they're blind. classic propaganda to fit the mode of basically
every post i've ever seen with 'hypewaders' as author.
more of the same, this time putting his brand of reality above all others. IMO, calling something 'unjustifiable' is basically saying "i don't understand the decision and don't approve of it, so it
must be wrong." fallacy anyone? of course since those who oppose him are
unjustifiable and
sufficiently blind hype is off the hook. he doesn't have to bother trying to understand how opposing opinions are subjectively justified because they are stupid and blind and unworthy of his effort. yes it's an easy road for hype.
yet stupendous American hubris
of course it's everyone's hubris but his own.
LOL. Who is complacent here? Seems to me by demonizing and alienating the opposition, you've become what you claim to loath.
that is RICH considering the context of the accusation. perhaps someone so dog-a-matic is indeed just a puppet for someone else, or for a 'canned world view' such that he is incapable of self-love. i still think though, that by the definition of calling opposing opinions 'blind' he has established an
extremely self-centered, holier than thou attitude. i believe it shows through well with the tone of the sentence under scrutiny and the original message,
in his first post on this page.
and (in face of the results)- denial.
All of the self-involved, self-serving, rhetorical bullshit and then the conclusion above. I ask seriously: How do you rationally base this conclusion on the
total shit used to reach it? IMO, the rational basis is that you are
completely irrational. I dub thee asshat.
..