I've often heard people saying that humans are using their brain to only 4% of their capacity. Is spirituality related to developing it's capacity. And what's the illumination of the human brain.![]()
I think it's an optimistic estimate.
I've often heard people saying that humans are using their brain to only 4% of their capacity. Is spirituality related to developing it's capacity. And what's the illumination of the human brain.![]()
If one says that he uses only 1% of his brain, is he bragging or stupid?
I've often heard people saying that humans are using their brain to only 4% of their capacity. Is spirituality related to developing it's capacity. And what's the illumination of the human brain.![]()
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0004-282X2004000600005&script=sci_arttextBetween 26 and 34 weeks of gestation, the normal process of neuron loss and axon retraction is at its height, with increased metabolic activity and increased vulnerability around the area of the basal ganglia, the caudate nucleus, the cerebellum and the optic radiations.
I am curious as to what you mean by 'evolve further'. It implies a direction to our evolution. It implies we represent some sort of (current) pinnacle. Perhaps I misunderstand you, which is why I am seeking clarification.why would we NOT evolve further unless killing each other, disease and starvation are all we have to look forward to.
Well, we use all of the brain, but not at all times (if you don't have some kind of seizure).I've often heard people saying that humans are using their brain to only 4% of their capacity. Is spirituality related to developing it's capacity. And what's the illumination of the human brain.![]()
*************So, we can definitely function without 85% to 90% of our brains.
So, we can definitely function without 85% to 90% of our brains.
Probably because they are.Why would anyone, who believed in evolution, believe for a moment that humans were utilising only 4% of the capacity of any bodily organ?
Let's cut the scientific crap and look at this in a completely hypothetical way.
Say we do only use a small percentage of our brain, I've heard that people on hallucinogenics such as LSD use more of their brain than people who aren't on drugs. Perhaps this isn't true: I'm not really a scientist but let's just imagine, for the sake of the argument, that it is true.
They're seeing things that "aren't there" but how do we know that the things that they're seeing aren't actually there? Maybe they are there, we just can't see them because the amount of brain power we're using isn't strong enough to let us see those things.
Any thoughts?
We use all our brain. Get used to that as a fact. It is not all wholly active at the same time for two reasons a) we don't need it all active at the same time b) we couldn't cool it down fast enough.Let's cut the scientific crap and look at this in a completely hypothetical way.
Say we do only use a small percentage of our brain, I've heard that people on hallucinogenics such as LSD use more of their brain than people who aren't on drugs. Perhaps this isn't true: I'm not really a scientist but let's just imagine, for the sake of the argument, that it is true.
They're seeing things that "aren't there" but how do we know that the things that they're seeing aren't actually there? Maybe they are there, we just can't see them because the amount of brain power we're using isn't strong enough to let us see those things.
Any thoughts?
We use all our brain. Get used to that as a fact. It is not all wholly active at the same time for two reasons a) we don't need it all active at the same time b) we couldn't cool it down fast enough.
We know about its activity because we can monitor it. There isn't any question about that. So your hypothetical question becomes meaningless.
Sorry.
You may have a point there, but since our scientists do not research these stuff for the fear of being ridiculed, we will never know.
May be...someday, when I become a billionaire![]()