I do not doubt the existence of anomalies that are difficult to explain, but that doesn't automatically lead to the conclusion that supernatural phenomena are in play. As DaveC mentioned, difficulty in verification isn't a win by forfeit for the claimant. Extraordinary claims still require extraordinary evidence.Aye, there's the rub. These things all hit the same epistemic wall. How do others witness an experience that is sui generis to the one person. The whole thing with an OBE is its subjective nature - no one watching Dave while he astrally projects is likely to see anything other than Dave snoozing. All that's left are anecdotes about astral projectors (projectors, is that the term?) who themselves see something, say during surgery, which they couldn't see or have knowledge of from their location on the operating table - like that oft-repeated blue tennis shoe anecdote.
![]()
The Shoe on the Ledge: Kimberly Clark Sharp's Account of Maria's NDE - Elizabeth Whitworth
Kimberly Clark Sharp says a woman named Maria saw a shoe on the ledge of the hospital when she was flatlining. I examine the story.elizabethwhitworth.com
The case at hand will (hopefully) clarify that an entirely subjective experience is indistinguishable from an hallucination. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the claim, but it does move us into evaluation of probabilities.
Which is more likely? An authentic OBE / NDE / Astral Vacation or...
Are you on drugs, boy? (even if that drug is endogenous)