Are computers developing an independent memory?

Write4U

Write4U

Valued Senior Member
A new quasiparticle lurks in semiconductors

Think of the implications......:eek:

072518_CC_quasiparticle_feat.jpg

The collexon is similar to a quasiparticle known as an exciton, a pairing of an electron and a hole (SN: 5/17/14, p. 5). While these pairs go it alone in excitons, electron-hole duos in collexons join forces with the surrounding sea of electrons, Christian Nenstiel, a physicist at the Technical University of Berlin, and colleagues report.
Click to expand...
https://www.sciencenews.org/article...8&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Editors_Picks
 
Response to the thread's title: what does that have to do with the content of the OP?

Write4U said:
A new quasiparticle lurks in semiconductors

Think of the implications......:eek:

072518_CC_quasiparticle_feat.jpg


https://www.sciencenews.org/article...8&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Editors_Picks
Click to expand...
They have thought of the implications. From your own source:
It’s too early to predict applications, says study coauthor Gordon Callsen of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland.
Click to expand...
 
river said:
What does " new quasiparticle " even mean ?
Click to expand...
A quasiparticle is something that emerges(typically in a medium) that behaves like a particle, but from a fundamental point of view isn't a particle. In this case, it's an electron and a hole stuck together. A hole (absence of an electron in a medium) cannot be part of a composite particle, but it behaves as if it is. For more, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasiparticle
 
Re title of thread

Has a computer stated "I think therefore I am"?

:)
 
For specific memory modules, the line drawn between a graph is usually the latter point of all points in the graph as considered- there would be more like tanx + a segment to form a line eventually enough motion a million Newtons of force. All points in a hyperbola would be more considered for a graph then font or text- a memory would then fit into a hyperbola out of shape of a force or tangent that programmed or constructed but not just built into a segment of code or arrays. Tanx then predicts a normal that will stop at a particular RAM. Summation is then all of the memory for whatever can hold the volatility and v = volatility then makes reduction in an OS as normal as possible especially with force like an injection of software. Viability to this claim would then make v1 = Volatility over a certain distance - OS as normal as possible - and possibility with force as tangent as possible. Memory is then more tangible for chips then discs and then makes input more like an OS then a memory set or module like a normal force over a shorter distance.
 
Forceman said:
For specific memory modules, the line drawn between a graph is usually the latter point of all points in the graph as considered- there would be more like tanx + a segment to form a line eventually enough motion a million Newtons of force. All points in a hyperbola would be more considered for a graph then font or text- a memory would then fit into a hyperbola out of shape of a force or tangent that programmed or constructed but not just built into a segment of code or arrays. Tanx then predicts a normal that will stop at a particular RAM. Summation is then all of the memory for whatever can hold the volatility and v = volatility then makes reduction in an OS as normal as possible especially with force like an injection of software. Viability to this claim would then make v1 = Volatility over a certain distance - OS as normal as possible - and possibility with force as tangent as possible. Memory is then more tangible for chips then discs and then makes input more like an OS then a memory set or module like a normal force over a shorter distance.
Click to expand...
Not sure if this word salad came from a person or a random post generator.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top