I wanted to ask. I started to, but then I stopped. But I wanted to.
???
Ask what? Let me pose a simple, albeit perhaps
somewhat unrelated, question here to illustrate what I was getting at with the above: Is deliberately singling out transgender athletes , non-transgender athletes (whom one mistakes for a transgender athlete), and transgender high school kids, among others, for mockery and derision evidence of transphobic attitudes? When one answers "no" to this query, that's rather curious to me--to put it mildly.
Empathy and sympathy are two different things, though they are not always so easy to parse. The former almost necessarily involves some sort of
identification with the other, and when that is absent... it's just
really hard. For me, my perceived lack of empathy is largely a consequence of the fact that I simply don't see a whole lot of
what I would describe as humanity or animality in most people. They consistently and reliably respond to very clear signs and indicators--they're uber pavlovian--but when consideration of nuance, reading between the lines, and accounting for broader contexts are factors, they often fail. Bigly. (Non-human) animals, imho, tend not to struggle so much with these things, and so empathy for them is easy for me.
Edit: In short, it's easy for me to empathize with those who are targeted or victimized--I know the experience, and I know the
feelings well, in part due to the particular nature of damage to my mesial temporal lobe (probably--obviously, that's speculation). I
also know that people are fickle, inconsistent, prone to not making a whole lot of sense at certain times, prone to hypocrisy, etc., but--except when these assume particular forms--are, while familiar in some respects, also not relatable at all times.
Take as an example the consistent non-response of the press pool when The Rapist in Chief singles out a woman or women to insult and berate--and no one says anything. This is beyond weird. I mean, just a "that's hardly appropriate or called for" would suffice, but they say nothing. It's really hard for me to see those people
as people, in those moments, even while I may be able to imagine a scenario in which I might respond, or not respond rather, similarly. Though, given my temperament such scenarios are
somewhat difficult to imagine, but they exist nonetheless.
Wittgenstein wrote a fair bit on this phenomenon, which was very personal to him. But were an ethnologist, and ethologist, an anthropologist, a sociologist, etc. to explore this, there might be a bit more to chew on. But as it stands, it seems to be an empathy deficit which is very RD Laingian in natures : the "problem" or phenomenon manifest in the individual, but it's roots and origins lie within (the nature of) society--particularly as a species which is more pack social naturally is thrust into a world wherein herd social behaviors dominate, and may perhaps even make some bit more "sense".