So the Seattle News Fax, which comes around to a couple people in my office, is reporting for its 11/29 edition, that The Netherlands have approved euthanasia in the lower parliamentary house by a 104-40 vote. This article also notes that Upper chamber approval next year is seen as a formality.
The question at hand, I suppose, is relatively obvious.
As a last-paragraph note, the article mentions that Dutch Calvinists have drawn parallels between euthanasia and Nazi Germany. As a less obvious question than the big one, is that entirely fair?
At any rate, and again in search of brevity:
* I think legalization of euthanasia is, overall, a good thing.
* Ethical and legal difficulties need to be worked out, obviously. However, just because we can imagine some people trying to take advantage of the situation is no reason to not go forward. (On the one hand, can you imagine if we worried about people trying to take unfair advantage of capitalism? To the other, are we worried about other people taking advantage of a system, or are we reflecting on our own fears concerning our own capabilities?)
* I believe that each and every one of us has a sovereign right to terminate our own life at will. Furthermore, I support the right of certain people in my life to make certain decisions on my behalf at certain times. If we cannot trust our own families with our lives, do we really live in civilization? Or are we afraid that we've raised our children to be the kind of successful people who would put a round through us if we knock ourselves out on the hatchback?
I think the primary objections to euthanasia presently and always have consisted of a base-level distrust of our own selves. This runs deeply enough to imply that an individual dislikes legalized euthanasia because they fear for their own wellbeing. If I fear my friends killing me when I'm sick, I ought to put a better effort into finding friends. If I fear my children pillaging the estate, maybe I should have raised them better.
The only alternative would be to desensitize the culture, so that there is no visceral emotion at the perception of someone else's pain. Of course, many people do seem to treat compassion and love as concepts we'd be better off without. I don't know ... I remember the IV scars up and down my grandmother's arm, and a host of horrible symptoms. While I don't think the situation called for euthanasia, it did turn my stomach. The only reason people are asking for this right, to terminate the life of an already-dying loved one, is because they can't stand to see someone they believe they love in extended pain. So mass desensitization seems to be a proper solution for euthanasia, but I would imagine violent crime to go through the roof. Give a little, get a little, eh?
thanx,
Tiassa
------------------
Whether God exists or does not exist, He has come to rank among the most sublime and useless truths.--Denis Diderot
The question at hand, I suppose, is relatively obvious.
As a last-paragraph note, the article mentions that Dutch Calvinists have drawn parallels between euthanasia and Nazi Germany. As a less obvious question than the big one, is that entirely fair?
At any rate, and again in search of brevity:
* I think legalization of euthanasia is, overall, a good thing.
* Ethical and legal difficulties need to be worked out, obviously. However, just because we can imagine some people trying to take advantage of the situation is no reason to not go forward. (On the one hand, can you imagine if we worried about people trying to take unfair advantage of capitalism? To the other, are we worried about other people taking advantage of a system, or are we reflecting on our own fears concerning our own capabilities?)
* I believe that each and every one of us has a sovereign right to terminate our own life at will. Furthermore, I support the right of certain people in my life to make certain decisions on my behalf at certain times. If we cannot trust our own families with our lives, do we really live in civilization? Or are we afraid that we've raised our children to be the kind of successful people who would put a round through us if we knock ourselves out on the hatchback?
I think the primary objections to euthanasia presently and always have consisted of a base-level distrust of our own selves. This runs deeply enough to imply that an individual dislikes legalized euthanasia because they fear for their own wellbeing. If I fear my friends killing me when I'm sick, I ought to put a better effort into finding friends. If I fear my children pillaging the estate, maybe I should have raised them better.
The only alternative would be to desensitize the culture, so that there is no visceral emotion at the perception of someone else's pain. Of course, many people do seem to treat compassion and love as concepts we'd be better off without. I don't know ... I remember the IV scars up and down my grandmother's arm, and a host of horrible symptoms. While I don't think the situation called for euthanasia, it did turn my stomach. The only reason people are asking for this right, to terminate the life of an already-dying loved one, is because they can't stand to see someone they believe they love in extended pain. So mass desensitization seems to be a proper solution for euthanasia, but I would imagine violent crime to go through the roof. Give a little, get a little, eh?
thanx,
Tiassa
------------------
Whether God exists or does not exist, He has come to rank among the most sublime and useless truths.--Denis Diderot