And so then it would seem, that if every british source is automatically untrustworthy, and every indian source is automatically being effectively misrepresented, and the chances of me finding a page on the internet with a very few specific keywords is vanishingly small, that we are at an impasse.
Not at all, there are many types of sources, but you'd be hard pressed to find one on the famines which was not controlled by the British media at the time. Or did you think its a coincidence that there is no news out of India for the 10 years following the mutiny in 1857? Whatever happened during that time of silence, the mutiny was most effectively crushed. It had to be, it was the first armed uprising in the British empire.