An experimental piece of evidence that should make some think more about those things that our conventional physicists call "black holes"

exchemist said:
He seems to be from the Antipodes, where hoorroo means goodbye, I now discover - perhaps you knew that. Anyway I’ve come out of this bizarre exchange ahead, with a new vernacular word. :biggrin:
Click to expand...
No I didn't know that. Since he is 66, and thinks moving a lens around with some lights in a dark room, resembles images from the cutting edge multinational Even Horizon project, I naturally assumed he was an idiot/senile and just spelt a word wrong.
Hooray or Hoorah or something.
 
Last edited:
exchemist said:
I’ve read the CNN link you posted, which seems to be about observation of a jet, emerging perpendicular to the plane of a ring of light emission around a black hole. The ring is explained as being due to matter orbiting the hole. The cause of the jet seems unexplained so far. (I’ve read about these jets before: they seem to be a known thing.)

What has this to do with the subject of your thread?
Click to expand...
Это не выходящая струя. Это входящая струя.
 
goniahedron said:
i will now bid you all hoorroo.
Click to expand...
You were right about one thing: this was indeed, a very short thread.

If you come back in another 5-6 years, please first review the site rules on providing explanations along with posting any external links or media. There's a link to them in post 2.
 
goniahedron:

Welcome (back) to sciforums.
goniahedron said:
OK. In 2016 a group of physicists from around the world decided to use number of telescopes that were scattered around the world into an array of telescopes capable of gathering both optical , as well as non-optical data. Working together over a period of 6 months, I believe, they made a composite picture of a non-descriptive galaxy about 60 or 70 ly away from the earth.
Click to expand...
What is a "non-descriptive galaxy"?
goniahedron said:
Finally, they combined all the data that had been gathered and that's how the first 'real image' of a black hole was lobbied all around the world.
Click to expand...
Wasn't it an image of the black hole at the centre of the M87 galaxy? It's not 60 or 70 ly away, by the way. It's about 53 million ly away.

goniahedron said:
it goes without saying that such a news created a hysteria in the the scientific environments.
Click to expand...
If by "hysteria", you mean that it attracted a lot of interest, then you're right. The world's news media also found it to be newsworthy.

Anyway, what has all this got to do with your video?

Are you trying to make the point that you believe the black hole images were faked using a hand-held torch shining through a glass ball? If that's your claim, why not just say it? Why all the complaining and beating around the bush and trying to publicise your video?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top