You may be right, especially since 'energetic conventionalism' is meaningless.
An atomistic theory of matter
- Thread starter Atomsz
- Start date
Yes, I'm beginning to realise that maybe the appropriate logical thing to do with others such as the god also.
It's just a real shame that the administrators are so free and easy with such nonsense, that at any other science forum they would be permanently banned.
Yes, he is in the alternative section, but even there people that push such nonsense should be able to support it. :shrug:
The "scientific community" tried the description of Nature with the energetic concept and did not work.You may be right, especially since 'energetic conventionalism' is meaningless.
The atomistic theory has solved the central problem of the physical description of Nature and works very well.
Last edited:
I leave the forum but I'm never leaving the physics.
Bye, please don't come back.
Fundamental Principles in Physics 31.08.2015
To describe Nature the following principles are sufficient and necessary:
Fundamental Principles are
- neither the position, nor the velocity of particles is ever known precisely,
- the matter is consisting of four kinds of stable particles, e, p, P and E, with elementary masses me, and mP, and with elementary electric charges ± e,
- the stable particles carry two elementary charges qi = { - e, + e, + e, - e}, and gi = { - g ∙ me, + g ∙ me, + g ∙ mP, - g ∙ mP}, i = e,p,P,E,
- both fields generated through the elementary charges as interaction between particles and the fields propagate with the constant velocity c,
- the gravitation is generated through elementary gravitational charges gi with the universal gravitational constant G = g/4∙ π similar to the generation of the electromagnetism through elementary electric charges qi.
The Fundamental Principles are self consistent, complete and are in compliance with all experimental observations on Nature.
The energy is not conserved and the Atomistic Theory of Matter is the consequence.
The laws of nature are non-deterministic, however causal.
A paradigm shift is necessary for laws established in physics.
Nature does nothing in vain.
To describe Nature the following principles are sufficient and necessary:
Fundamental Principles are
- neither the position, nor the velocity of particles is ever known precisely,
- the matter is consisting of four kinds of stable particles, e, p, P and E, with elementary masses me, and mP, and with elementary electric charges ± e,
- the stable particles carry two elementary charges qi = { - e, + e, + e, - e}, and gi = { - g ∙ me, + g ∙ me, + g ∙ mP, - g ∙ mP}, i = e,p,P,E,
- both fields generated through the elementary charges as interaction between particles and the fields propagate with the constant velocity c,
- the gravitation is generated through elementary gravitational charges gi with the universal gravitational constant G = g/4∙ π similar to the generation of the electromagnetism through elementary electric charges qi.
The Fundamental Principles are self consistent, complete and are in compliance with all experimental observations on Nature.
The energy is not conserved and the Atomistic Theory of Matter is the consequence.
The laws of nature are non-deterministic, however causal.
A paradigm shift is necessary for laws established in physics.
Nature does nothing in vain.
You're are crazier than a bed bug.
Silly gibberish that is a complete waste of time. Your ignorance is only exceeded by your arrogance.
Bye bye then.
I don’t want to hold valid any bad theoretical physical concepts, I want describe Nature such as it is!
Repeating the same thing over and over is not a very compelling method to prove your idea.
Of course since your idea is bad to begin with you don't have a lot of options.
Of course, the ATOMISTIC THEORY OF MATTER IS THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ULTIMATE TRUTH OF NATURE!
Without any other options!!!
Last edited:
Wow, capitol letters!!! Very persuasive argument...
For the description of Nature, there are only few natural constants needed: c, e, me, mP, g.
The Lagrange multipliers such as h, h0 =h/387.7 are not natural constants, the Boltzmann constant k and a possibly further generalized constant describe the equilibrium state of matter.
And one principle for the determination of the equation of motions of the field and the particles.
... without "capitol letters".
The Lagrange multipliers such as h, h0 =h/387.7 are not natural constants, the Boltzmann constant k and a possibly further generalized constant describe the equilibrium state of matter.
And one principle for the determination of the equation of motions of the field and the particles.
... without "capitol letters".
Last edited: