An atomistic theory of matter

SciencePolice.jpg

You don't agree with the Nobel Prize in Physics given in 1902, 1917, 1918, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1927, 1929, 1930, 1932, 1933, 1935, 1936, 1937, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1949, 1950, 1952, 1954, 1955, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1990, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2015.

In addition, you stand opposed to the award of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry given in 1914, 1922, 1936, 1944, 1966, 1971, 1981, and 1998.


And the remainder you don't understand because you don't understand the relation between science, humans and reality.

It is true, with the most Nobel Prize award, I stay opposit. The mainstream is only a physically invalid conventionalism. Opposit to the standard physics, I understand the "true" relations between physical science and the Nature.
 
Only one right physics exist. The mainstream is wrong physics.
Yes, yes I know, you are genius and the rest of the mean old world is just not smart enough to see it. It must be difficult for you knowing that only you know the truth. Why can't the rest of the world see that only you out of 7 billion people know the real truth. Maybe that is something you should really consider asking yourself.

Bye bye and good luck.
 
Yes, yes I know, you are genius and the rest of the mean old world is just not smart enough to see it. It must be difficult for you knowing that only you know the truth. Why can't the rest of the world see that only you out of 7 billion people know the real truth. Maybe that is something you should really consider asking yourself.

Bye bye and good luck.
"Why can't the rest of the world see that only you out of 7 billion people know the real truth."
Copernicus was also against the "truth" of several billion people.
 
Probably I am really the only guy who know what the stable elementary particles and the both fundamental fields are, how the fields and particles move and how the particles build bound stable and instable states.
 
"Why can't the rest of the world see that only you out of 7 billion people know the real truth."
Copernicus was also against the "truth" of several billion people.
Come on, you are way smarter than Copernicus was, aren't you? The thing I can't understand is why the smartest person in the world can't convince anybody he is even close to right? I guess it could be that we are all so below his almost god like intelligence that we just don't 'get it'. I suppose the other possibility is that he is just bat-shit crazy. I wonder which it is? Hey, I know, let's see what the smartest man in the world thinks!!
 
Probably I am really the only guy who know what the stable elementary particles and the both fundamental fields are, how the fields and particles move and how the particles build bound stable and instable states.
I am sure you are the only one that 'knows' that. Alas, the rest of us are trapped in reality and are bound by logic, reason and evidence.
 
Die Verhältnismäßigkeit:

..ohne Kommentar:


Der Satz vom Pythagoras 24 Wörter


Vaterunser 66 Wörter


Die Zehngebote 167 Wörter


Die amerikanische Unabhängigkeitserklärung 1.300 Wörter


Die amerikanische Verfassung mit 27 Anhang 7.818 Wörter


EU Regelung für Kraut 26.911 Wörter


Das Unversum besteht aus 4 Arten von stabilen Teilchen und aus zwei Feldern!

Der liebe Gott hat es am besten gemacht!
 
Last edited:
It is true, with the most Nobel Prize award, I stay opposit. The mainstream is only a physically invalid conventionalism. Opposit to the standard physics, I understand the "true" relations between physical science and the Nature.


Of course you are!

patting+on+head.png
 
"... let's see what the smartest man in the world thinks."
You can get it from [crackpots Я us].
You're obviously not smart at all. You've already been suspended once for spamming your website.

I wonder how long your next ban will be for?
 
You're obviously not smart at all. You've already been suspended once for spamming your website.

I wonder how long your next ban will be for?

I reported his spam.

He probably won't learn anything from receiving more suspensions, but we can hope.
 
My letter of protest to the Nobel Prize Committee because neutrino oscillations can physically not occure.
I'm sure the Nobel committee will rush to retract the prize once they receive your letter. Or not.
 
Back
Top