What I find very strange are the types of responses sometimes thrown up
"I used to be ??? religion but I studied xxx and yyy also ttt before I became a ggg"
Didn't know about the adaptability of theist beliefs. Weird
Well, theistic/deistic/faith beliefs are sometimes in flux...if one never doubts or questions his/her beliefs, that usually means they are too afraid to doubt. Too afraid to see if what they believe is ''real,'' or at least...testable. For example, I left Christianity a few years ago, and identified as an atheist for a time, and during that period, I explored Buddhism, and even Islam. I felt a connection spiritually to different philosophies. Then, I came back recently to believing in God, and all I can say is that spirituality isn't about an ''end game,'' with cookie cutter perspectives (not for me, anyway). I can see now, that it's always been about the path to God, and to learning more about myself. Religion to me, is often times legalistic, and seeks to control the masses, than set free. That's the problem with it.
That said, my worldview isn't entirely shaped by my belief in God. Not sure if that makes sense, but many people start out believing one thing, and over time, they have a change of heart...or they simply stop believing in whatever it was they originally believed. Having said that, I never felt comfortable as an atheist, emotionally. Logically, yes...just not emotionally.
It brings me comfort and peace to believe that God exists. This belief doesn't serve me as a ''crutch'', it simply brings me a sense of peace that I don't find in the secular world. And no one can prove that God does not exist, so there's that, too.
When I labeled myself an atheist, I had an indifference to faith, to all things considered spiritual or religious. But, I knew then what draws people to believing, so I wasn't on of those non-believers who mocked anyone's views or beliefs. Of course, we should all take issue with anyone practicing a belief system that can harm others. But, the challenge with these discussions is if you're the type of person that you accept that things exist only if you can physically see, hear or touch them - then you won't empathize with drives a person towards spirituality, in a general sense. Not that a non-believer ''must'' empathize, but just saying.
Many historians for example believe that Jesus actually existed. I believe that his teachings have value, but I also believe in God. It's hard to accept for some, that he existed at all, because of the religious story that has been attached to him. But, I've been studying his teachings lately, and he didn't seem like someone who was at all ''about'' religion.
I don't think it's folly to believe in the possibility of the supernatural existing, but I can see why some may think it so.