A tensional theory with toroidal projection and cycles (BULNPQS)

pepeluis76 said:
Choose a question and I'll answer it. Why aren't all the constants in science constants, and why do they depend on the mother constant ts/ls^2? Why something and not nothing? Why cycles? Why Hubble problem? etc. ... Choose and I'll answer.
Click to expand...

This is an English-speaking forum. Though it's obvious why a chatbot would be recruited so as to remedy the translation barrier, AI as a mediator of an independent speculator's conceptions about cosmology just does not fly here. Chatbots are inherently sycophants of whoever is utilizing their services.

pepeluis76 said:
[...] I am the creator of the BULNPQS model, an attempt to construct a geometric-fractal basis where everything emerges from a single string with tension Ts and length ℓs (you should read Appendix 6).

[...] driver BULNPQS:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XYAsmwS8Oey2uGY5pdKCxc62MMf-PEtT?usp=sharing
Click to expand...

No wary individual is going to download and open strange files in the malware-infested world of today. That's doubly the case if, again, they don't even accommodate an Anglophone forum like this one (and alternatively, the chatbot is employed as remedy).
_
 
I'm ending this thread. Try speaking in a Chinese forum without a translator, and you'll understand me. Besides, I've noticed you're uncomfortable using Google Books to read the model and Deepseek to ask questions. It's not malware or a virus; the purpose of your questions is to justify your attacks. It's not worth continuing this thread. Bye, don't waste your time with me.
 
pepeluis76 said:
I'm ending this thread. Try speaking in a Chinese forum without a translator, and you'll understand me. Besides, I've noticed you're uncomfortable using Google Books to read the model and Deepseek to ask questions. It's not malware or a virus; the purpose of your questions is to justify your attacks. It's not worth continuing this thread. Bye, don't waste your time with me.
Click to expand...
We just prefer talking to real people about real science.

Bye.
 
Thanks for being clear this time. You don't have to waste time with messages, just say it clearly. Thanks for the last message; it's the only one worthwhile in this thread. Bye.
 
pepeluis76 said:
[...] Try speaking in a Chinese forum without a translator [...]
Click to expand...

That's essentially what I just said: I get it. But this forum is constantly besieged by eccentrics utilizing AI as their surrogate, and thus the antipathy toward chatbots (in addition to their psittacine method and subservience).
_
 
C C said:
That's essentially what I just said: I get it. But this forum is constantly besieged by eccentrics utilizing AI as their surrogate, and thus the antipathy toward chatbots (in addition to their psittacine method and subservience).
_
Click to expand...
Psittacine is nice. :)
 
C C said:
That's essentially what I just said: I get it. But this forum is constantly besieged by eccentrics utilizing AI as their surrogate, and thus the antipathy toward chatbots (in addition to their psittacine method and subservience).
_
Click to expand...
 
Thank you, I just wanted to validate the model with real people, I understand, sorry for the inconvenience. Goodbye, if you're interested in alternative models, try them out yourselves; even if it's just a fantasy, it will help you understand physics better. Goodbye.
 
pepeluis76 said:
Thank you, I just wanted to validate the model with real people, I understand, sorry for the inconvenience. Goodbye, if you're interested in alternative models, try them out yourselves; even if it's just a fantasy, it will help you understand physics better. Goodbye.
Click to expand...

Try Physics Forums, which is arguably closer to an actual workshop. Although the usual assumption might be that anyone visiting here already did make the attempt.

https://www.physicsforums.com
_
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top