A Solution to the Black Hole Information Paradox

[tomf]

https://vixra.org/pdf/2006.0231v1.pdf

Abstract: It’s shown that black holes contradict laws of special relativity in some local inertial frames, which violates the equivalence principle. To solve the problem, a new metric for Schwarzschild geometry is derived that doesn’t predict black holes and is confirmed by observations.

1. Explain how the "alternative" theory differs from the mainstream theory in its predictions/explanations of phenomena.

Like the mainstream theory, GR, the alternative theory agrees with relevant observations, as shown in section 7, "Experimental confirmation of the new metric".

2. Outline why the alternative theory is superior to the mainstream one.

It obeys the equivalence principle, and the black hole information paradox doesn't apply to it.

3. Explain any flaws in the standard science one that are addressed by the alternative theory.

GR violates its own equivalence principle, and the black hole information paradox applies to it.

4. Outline any experimental evidence or tests that do/might enable us to distinguish between the alternative theory and the mainstream one, in order to determine which is superior.

This is covered in section 7, "Experimental confirmation of the new metric". Tests in stronger gravity than have been done, or more precise tests, could distinguish between the alternative theory and the mainstream one.

 

[paddoboy]

Abstract: It’s shown that black holes contradict laws of special relativity in some local inertial frames, which violates the equivalence principle.

See you in Stockholm in November then for the Nobel...OK?
Unless of course this covid 19 sees that cancelled!

So many ideas abound re invalidating SR/GR, particularly on remote science forums open to any Tom, Dick or Harry...ho hum

 

[paddoboy]

And of course what adds or otherwise to the credibility of this so called theory, is that it is presented on vixra! Oh Lordy!!!

 

[river]

https://vixra.org/pdf/2006.0231v1.pdf

Abstract: It’s shown that black holes contradict laws of special relativity in some local inertial frames, which violates the equivalence principle. To solve the problem, a new metric for Schwarzschild geometry is derived that doesn’t predict black holes and is confirmed by observations.

1. Explain how the "alternative" theory differs from the mainstream theory in its predictions/explanations of phenomena.

Like the mainstream theory, GR, the alternative theory agrees with relevant observations, as shown in section 7, "Experimental confirmation of the new metric".

2. Outline why the alternative theory is superior to the mainstream one.

It obeys the equivalence principle, and the black hole information paradox doesn't apply to it.

3. Explain any flaws in the standard science one that are addressed by the alternative theory.

GR violates its own equivalence principle, and the black hole information paradox applies to it.

4. Outline any experimental evidence or tests that do/might enable us to distinguish between the alternative theory and the mainstream one, in order to determine which is superior.

This is covered in section 7, "Experimental confirmation of the new metric". Tests in stronger gravity than have been done, or more precise tests, could distinguish between the alternative theory and the mainstream one.

Of course pad never actually addresses any of your above .

 

[paddoboy]

Of course pad never actually addresses any of your above .

I'm waiting for your expert opinion on this river.

 

[river]

I'm waiting for your expert opinion on this river.

I have none

I am waiting for your expert opinion pad .

 

[paddoboy]

Obviously as river knows, being banned from the sciences, if any truly alternative to the already verified and validated aspects of BH's was forthcoming, it would be responsibly written up on a paper, with a reputable publisher [not vixra] for proper professional peer review, not simply dragged out of your rear end remarks, in the alternative section of a science forum open to any Tom, Dick or Harry...or river

 

[paddoboy]

I have none

I am waiting for your expert opinion pad .

I'm not an expert river...you?

 

[river]

I'm not an expert river...you?

You are the expert pad .

 

[paddoboy]

You are the expert pad .

No, I'm no expert river, and I also havn't got some illogical inclination to automatically assume some alternative nonsense is superior to what mainstream has accepted, and reasonably validated.
Plus I don't believe as you do, that any alternative, by anyone at all, should be always be considered. I theorise I have a unicorn in my back yard, is obviously not worth wasting one's time considering....claims of an atomic war on Mars between Alien species is equally not worth considering...or the ratbag conspiracy claims of NASA having faked the Moon landings...or a myriad of other nonsensical alternatives, that have already been debunked, like Plasma/Electric universe.
Bye river. You have much to consider and mull over.

 

[river]

No, I'm no expert river, and I also havn't got some illogical inclination to automatically assume some alternative nonsense is superior to what mainstream has accepted, and reasonably validated.
Plus I don't believe as you do, that any alternative, by anyone at all, should be always be considered. I theorise I have a unicorn in my back yard, is obviously not worth wasting one's time considering....claims of an atomic war on Mars between Alien species is equally not worth considering...or the ratbag conspiracy claims of NASA having faked the Moon landings...or a myriad of other nonsensical alternatives, that have already been debunked, like Plasma/Electric universe.
Bye river. You have much to consider and mull over.

Actually you have alot to dwell upon . Cosmic Plasmas , dark energy and dark matter .

 

[paddoboy]

Actually you have alot to dwell upon . Cosmic Plasmas , dark energy and dark matter .

Yep, all exist...so?

 

[river]

Yep, all exist...so?

You have a lot to dwell on .

 

[paddoboy]

You have a lot to dwell on .

We all do river......I dwell on the awesome nature of the universe we are a part of, and how we now understand a great deal of it.
You dwell on deluding yourself, that you are able to claim mainstream is wrong and claim unsupported, unscientific dribble as a replacement.

 

[river]

river said: ↑
You have a lot to dwell on .

We all do river......I dwell on the awesome nature of the universe we are a part of, and how we now understand a great deal of it.
You dwell on deluding yourself, that you are able to claim mainstream is wrong and claim unsupported, unscientific dribble as a replacement.

Seeing the Universe as it is , is what I dwell on . The Physical Real Universe .

 

[paddoboy]

Seeing the Universe as it is , is what I dwell on . The Physical Real Universe .

If only!

 

[river]

river said: ↑
Seeing the Universe as it is , is what I dwell on . The Physical Real Universe .

If only!

You know I Do pad , you know .

 

[paddoboy]

You know I Do pad , you know .

I know you are ignorant of BH's and hence deny them...I know you are ignorant of the framework we call spacetime...hence you again deny that....That's just for starters...and this is the end river, as I know where this will lead!
your usual trolling, asking why again, and again, and again and again.

 

[river]

I know you are ignorant of BH's and hence deny them...I know you are ignorant of the framework we call spacetime...hence you again deny that....That's just for starters...and this is the end river, as I know where this will lead!
your usual trolling, asking why again, and again, and again and again.

It has been interesting .

 

[Michael 345]

your usual trolling, asking why again, and again, and again and again.

Thread gets sluggish and sluggish and sluggish and zzzzzzzzz off the cliff we go