Is there a problem with someone having a false belief that has no negative effects or consequences?
Is there a problem with someone having a false belief that has no negative effects or consequences?
Who decides which consequences are negative? And that decision would be subjectve any way.
Any way, since you can't possibly know whether your belief is true or not until the moment of consequences, the concept of "true belief" is useless.
So, what's a true belief?
And true beliefs can't have negative consequences?
Is there a problem with someone having a false belief that has no negative effects or consequences?
Thanks, that's a concept I hadn't heard of before - helpful belief.
I like it!
Just to clarify, if someone gets really ill, then turns to religion, and that positive thinking about the concepts of that religion and its gods helps the person to recover and live in happiness, is then that belief in that new found religion true and is it helpful?
Alright, well I suppose I should've said, is there a problem with someone holding a false belief when there are no negative consequences (in acting in accord with it) under the correspondence theory of truth?Yes, there is a problem with someone holding a false belief:
All false beliefs have some negative consequences, sooner or later; this is why they are called false beliefs.
Is there a problem with someone having a false belief that has no negative effects or consequences?
Only for the person with the belief.
If there are no negative consequences how could that person have a problem. Or how could there be a problem
Is there a problem with someone having a false belief that has no negative effects or consequences?
These would be negative consequences, yes. So, given the conditions in the OP, these could not happen.False beliefs often tend to act as filter preventing / reducing comprehension on related topics. That of course could lead to missed opportunities (tangible, cognitive, etc.).